Mike Williams wrote:
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 18:37:
Mike Williams wrote:
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
Using a match instead of region would be si
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 18:37:
Mike Williams wrote:
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
Using a match instead of region would be simpler.
If one takes
Ok, please find attached my corrections to the c.vim file. (Diff
instructions.) Many thanks go to Tony for his invaluable help.
Especially with the diff command.
Synopsis:
Because hex values have the suffixes and the underscores it took a while
to come up with something which would handle
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 9/11/06, mwoehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mwoehlke wrote:
> Mike Williams wrote:
>> mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
>>> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least
things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
On 9/11/06, mwoehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mwoehlke wrote:
> Mike Williams wrote:
>> mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
>>> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
Using a match in
mwoehlke wrote:
Mike Williams wrote:
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
Using a match instead of region would be simpler.
If one takes KATE's c.xml as canonica
Mike Williams wrote:
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't know what the rules are in all kinds of C, but at least things
like 0x0L, 0x0u, 0x0UL are valid.
Using a match instead of region would be simpler.
If one takes KATE's c.xml as canonical, supported suff
mwoehlke did utter on 11/09/2006 17:44:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Mark Manning wrote:
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal
numbers. There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really
quickly. If you want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn region
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Mark Manning wrote:
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]" end
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Mark Manning wrote:
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]"
Mark Manning wrote:
> I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
> There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
> want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
>
> The test:
>
> syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]" end="\W"
>
>
Mark Manning did utter on 10/09/2006 23:52:
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]" end
On 9/11/06, Mark Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]
I saw in the c.vim that there was an error statement for octal numbers.
There isn't one for hex numbers so I made one really quickly. If you
want, just put it into the c.vim file. :-)
The test:
syn regioncHexErrorstart="0x\x*[g-zG-Z]" end="\W"
The highlight command:
hi link c
14 matches
Mail list logo
