Bill McCarthy wrote:
On Sun 8-Oct-06 7:39pm -0600, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Bill McCarthy wrote:
On Sun 8-Oct-06 5:42pm -0600, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
which are sti
On Sun 8-Oct-06 7:39pm -0600, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Bill McCarthy wrote:
>> On Sun 8-Oct-06 5:42pm -0600, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
>>
>>> When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
>>> patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
>>> which are still out
Bill McCarthy wrote:
On Sun 8-Oct-06 5:42pm -0600, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
which are still outdated on ftp...
The gzip.vim is clearly old, but comparing (vimdiff)
On Sun 8-Oct-06 5:42pm -0600, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
> patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
> which are still outdated on ftp...
The gzip.vim is clearly old, but comparing (vimdiff) the
eval.txt on the
Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
which are still outdated on ftp...
It shouldn't take too long. If they are out-of-date today, try again tomorrow.
Best regards,
Tony.
When "current" version of vim runtime will be updated for latest
patches? Patch 111 modifies autoload/gzip.vim and doc/eval.txt
which are still outdated on ftp...
--
Regards,
Sir Raorn.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
