On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Tony Mechelynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He said "all vim-dev messages" so I assumed he wanted _all_ the
> back-and-forth talk on the vim-dev group, not just the patches, which
> can still be found on the FTP server since 5.7.
this is what I meant indeed... all
I can reproduce it, and checked your patch. It seems good to me.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:00 PM, todesking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi there.
>
> I found a ruby command's bug on Windows VIM.
>
> :ruby require 'open-uri'
> :ruby open('http://google.com/')
> => SocketError: `initiali
hi there.
I found a ruby command's bug on Windows VIM.
:ruby require 'open-uri'
:ruby open('http://google.com/')
=> SocketError: `initialize': getaddrinfo: non-recoverable failure in
name resolution.
:ruby open('http://66.249.89.147')
=> vim dies
In Windows, NtInitialize() should called when i
Richard Hartmann, 30.06.2008:
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would
> > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link,
> > to all those patches f
On 01/07/08 01:50, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-07-01, Tony Mechelynck<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 01/07/08 01:05, Gary Johnson wrote:
>>> On 2008-06-30, Christian MICHON<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mechelynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian MICHON, 30.06.2008:
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tony Mechelynck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem with patches is bit-rot. Scripts will usually remain valid,
> > even when unattended; patches must be cared for, or after some time they
> > won't apply anymore.
> >
>
On 2008-07-01, Tony Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/07/08 01:05, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2008-06-30, Christian MICHON<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mechelynck
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> See http://vim.sourceforge.net/maillist.ph
On 01/07/08 01:05, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-06-30, Christian MICHON<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mechelynck
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> See http://vim.sourceforge.net/maillist.php#vim-dev under "Archive". I
>>> don't know under what format the ar
On 2008-06-30, Christian MICHON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mechelynck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See http://vim.sourceforge.net/maillist.php#vim-dev under "Archive". I
> > don't know under what format the archives are held.
> >
>
> web based format,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:37:41PM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:50 PM, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Thanks for the explanations. Apparently, we use a similar approach to
> >> build a git repo. Is yours already available somewhere ?
> >
> > Yes, it's av
On 30/06/08 23:08, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>
>> At the moment, when I try to sync my runtime files using
>>
>> rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/
>> ./runtime/ 2>&1 | tee rsync.log
>>
>> nothing happens (I have to hit Ctrl-C to get out of the
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dominique Pelle wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Dominique Pelle wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>>> Dominique Pelle wrote:
>>>
Here is another bug because of invalid utf-8 sequence:
==21329== Condition
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mechelynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See http://vim.sourceforge.net/maillist.php#vim-dev under "Archive". I
> don't know under what format the archives are held.
>
web based format, close to useless unless I write a clever awk script
after I individually
On 30/06/08 23:08, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>
>> At the moment, when I try to sync my runtime files using
>>
>> rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/
>> ./runtime/ 2>&1 | tee rsync.log
>>
>> nothing happens (I have to hit Ctrl-C to get out of the
On 30/06/08 23:00, Christian MICHON wrote:
> Hi Bram,
>
> I'm consolidating the dates I extracted from the ftp server for the
> git repo I'm creating, but I expect some of these dates to be off
> versus the mailing list dates.
>
> Is there somewhere where I could download mbox format of all vim-de
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> At the moment, when I try to sync my runtime files using
>
> rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/
> ./runtime/ 2>&1 | tee rsync.log
>
> nothing happens (I have to hit Ctrl-C to get out of the hang). By ftp, I
> can reach ftp://ftp.vim.or
Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would
> > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link,
> > to all those patches from dif
Hi Bram,
I'm consolidating the dates I extracted from the ftp server for the
git repo I'm creating, but I expect some of these dates to be off
versus the mailing list dates.
Is there somewhere where I could download mbox format of all vim-dev
messages since let's say version 6.0 ? Thanks in adva
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tony Mechelynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with patches is bit-rot. Scripts will usually remain valid,
> even when unattended; patches must be cared for, or after some time they
> won't apply anymore.
>
you can avoid bitrotting provided you can rebas
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:50 PM, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanations. Apparently, we use a similar approach to
>> build a git repo. Is yours already available somewhere ?
>
> Yes, it's available at git.debian.org[0]. update-patches[1] is the script I
> use. Lines
On 30/06/08 18:11, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> At the moment, when I try to sync my runtime files using
>
> rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/
> ./runtime/ 2>&1 | tee rsync.log
>
> nothing happens (I have to hit Ctrl-C to get out of the hang). By ftp, I
> can reach ftp
On 30/06/08 12:53, Ben Schmidt wrote:
>> I would
>> like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link,
>> to all those patches from different sources for different purposes and
>> needs, that are not *yet* on the mainline or for some reasons they will
>> never be.
>>
>> T
At the moment, when I try to sync my runtime files using
rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/
./runtime/ 2>&1 | tee rsync.log
nothing happens (I have to hit Ctrl-C to get out of the hang). By ftp, I
can reach ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/ but not its vim/ subfolder which
On 6/30/08, Richard Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> PS: Could/should we ask vim_use about their opinion? It might
> be that no one is interested or lots of people are waiting for this.
> Would this (voting/comment period) generally help in ways of
> deciding which patches to accept?
>
>
Ben Schmidt wrote:
>> As a host I would suggest code google [6], as it has svn access,
>> an issue tracker and a wiki. A link to this project from the
>> official vim site, will be appropriate (with the usual warnings),
>> although not strictly necessary.
>
> I too have been thinking for some ti
> I would
> like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link,
> to all those patches from different sources for different purposes and
> needs, that are not *yet* on the mainline or for some reasons they will
> never be.
>
> This will help:
>
> - to redirect people
easy way to earn money from online
more details
just click it
http://lakshmipriyasan.blogspot.com/
*
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
PS: Could/should we ask vim_use about their opinion? It might
be that no one is interested or lots of people are waiting for this.
Would this (voting/comment period) generally help in ways of
deciding which patches to accept?
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 15:19, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know. I can see it's somewhat useful, but it's also a "yet
> another option" thing.
True, yet this option would not impact VIM in any meaningful way.
I.e. it is a small, granular patch that does neither introduce
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would
> like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link,
> to all those patches from different sources for different purpose
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Dominique Pelle wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> Dominique Pelle wrote:
>>
>>> Here is another bug because of invalid utf-8 sequence:
>>>
>>> ==21329== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>>> ==21329==
31 matches
Mail list logo
