On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Manpreet Singh wrote:
> Hmm, I couldn't reproduce it with just expand this time though now
> but mkdir still crashes in f_mkdir. Stack below:
>
> % gdb /Applications/MacVim.app/Contents/MacOS/Vim
> (gdb) set args -u NONE -U NONE +'call mkdir(expand("abc",
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Dominique Pellé
wrote:
> glts wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new regexp engine seems unable to deal with combining characters.
>> This is on Vim 7.4.9. Steps to reproduce:
>>
>> :put =\"ca\u0300t\"
>> :echo getline('.') =~ '\%#=0a'
>> :echo getl
glts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new regexp engine seems unable to deal with combining characters.
> This is on Vim 7.4.9. Steps to reproduce:
>
> :put =\"ca\u0300t\"
> :echo getline('.') =~ '\%#=0a'
> :echo getline('.') =~ '\%#=1a'
>
> Only the old regexp engine finds the match.
Hi,
The new regexp engine seems unable to deal with combining characters.
This is on Vim 7.4.9. Steps to reproduce:
:put =\"ca\u0300t\"
:echo getline('.') =~ '\%#=0a'
:echo getline('.') =~ '\%#=1a'
Only the old regexp engine finds the match.
Best,
(Message has been boun
Hi,
when searching
/\?
the old regexp engine says
E64: \? follows nothing
and the new engine says
E866: (NFA regexp) Misplaced ?
E64: \? follows nothing
It may be me, but I'm uncomfortable with error messages being dependent
on the 'regexpengine' setting. Also
On 8/27/13 1:04 PM, Dominique Pellé wrote:
Manpreet Singh wrote:
(Please excuse any duplicate posts. Posting via news.gmane.org seems to have
bounced)
Platform: Mac OS X 10.8.4 64-bit (latest release at time of posting)
Version: MacVim 7.4.9 (vim original (hg) or vim/gvim based on macvim so
Manpreet Singh wrote:
> (Please excuse any duplicate posts. Posting via news.gmane.org seems to have
> bounced)
>
> Platform: Mac OS X 10.8.4 64-bit (latest release at time of posting)
>
> Version: MacVim 7.4.9 (vim original (hg) or vim/gvim based on macvim sources)
>
> Reproduction:
>
> :call
glts <676c7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe this is a typo in spell.c:
>
> diff -r 2ee5e568766c src/spell.c
> --- a/src/spell.cThu Aug 22 14:14:27 2013 +0200
> +++ b/src/spell.cSat Aug 24 17:08:07 2013 +0200
> @@ -10135,7 +10135,7 @@
> }
>
> /*
> - * "z?": Find badly spelled word under
I believe this is a typo in spell.c:
diff -r 2ee5e568766c src/spell.c
--- a/src/spell.cThu Aug 22 14:14:27 2013 +0200
+++ b/src/spell.cSat Aug 24 17:08:07 2013 +0200
@@ -10135,7 +10135,7 @@
}
/*
- * "z?": Find badly spelled word under or after the cursor.
+ * "z=": Find badly spelled wo
Charles Campbell wrote:
> tooth pik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:11:19PM -0400, Charles Campbell wrote:
> >> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >>> Bruno Sutic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> The change supporting this was done on July 12, 2013; its for v150,
> >> which has not been released as yet. That
Benoit Pierre wrote:
> Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
> indicator is misaligned.
>
> Before:
>
> :%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
>1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
> ^^^
> With the patch:
>
> :%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
>1 READM
(Please excuse any duplicate posts. Posting via news.gmane.org seems to have
bounced)
Platform: Mac OS X 10.8.4 64-bit (latest release at time of posting)
Version: MacVim 7.4.9 (vim original (hg) or vim/gvim based on macvim sources)
Reproduction:
:call expand('a', 'p', 0700)
causes immediat
tooth pik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:11:19PM -0400, Charles Campbell wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Bruno Sutic wrote:
The change supporting this was done on July 12, 2013; its for v150,
which has not been released as yet. That was the "bugfix" that I
was referring to; I think I misint
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Benoit Pierre wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, glts <676c7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Benoit Pierre
>> wrote:
>>> Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
>>> indicator is misaligned.
>>>
>>> [...]
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, glts <676c7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Benoit Pierre
> wrote:
>> Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
>> indicator is misaligned.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Wow, what an obscure feature. There's more to this bug: I c
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Benoit Pierre wrote:
> Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
> indicator is misaligned.
>
> Before:
>
> :%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
>1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
> ^^^
> With the patch:
>
> :
Hi,
Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
indicator is misaligned.
Before:
:%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
^^^
With the patch:
:%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
Hi,
Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match
indicator is misaligned.
Before:
:%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
^^^
With the patch:
:%s/\cvim/VIM/gc#
1 README.txt for version 7.4 of Vim: Vi IMproved.
18 matches
Mail list logo
