Re: [vim/vim] Quickfix: Problem if first pattern is an ignored multiline pattern (#1126)

Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Gerd Wachsmuth wrote: > Let us consider the errorfile errors.err > > info bla 3 > more info > error 2 > > with the errorformat setting > > set efm=%+Eerror\ %l,%-Winfo\ %m\ %l,%Zmore\ info > > In the above errorfile, the first line

Re: [vim/vim] Where do we see work for v8? (#900)

A 2016-10-05T22:51:22 -0700, vim-dev ML escreveu: > Am 2016-10-06 07:25, schrieb MadMaverick9: > > And yes - I choose to ignore this sentence, because QA is the > > developer's problem. Users & distro maintainers care more about stable > > code. The releases [1] directory here is a joke me thinks.

Re: [vim/vim] VIM highlights valid POSIX shell syntax as errorneous (#1147)

Andrew Shadura wrote: > > @chrisbra , why have you closed it? It is > documented, yet it is wrong, and has to be changed. > > "No need to quote RFCs or market penetration statistics". Clearly you are a posix user; there are also many bash users. In fact, there are