On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 12:11:37 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> With this patch the channel test failed on AppVeyor. However, when I
> run it on my Windows 7 system it passes...
Yes, I also tested Windows7. I'll update patch to work the part only Windows7
or older.
--
--
You receive
On 2016-10-27, 21:01 GMT, Charles E Campbell wrote:
> Well, I don't intend to spend hours re-inventing my scripts
> which do a lot of housekeeping and are responsible for
> updating my website, and which work with vimballs. Nor am
> I about to start keeping your and other's git repositories
>
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-10-27, 11:58 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>> Ohhh, so that's what you mean. Well, here is another try: Not
>> being imitated, or not being a copycat himself, don't
>> necessarily mean that Dr. Chip is wrong, especially with Vim,
>> which prides himself about allowing t
Patch 8.0.0051 (after 8.0.0048)
Problem:New code for job_stop() breaks channel test on AppVeyor.
Solution: Revert the change.
Files: src/os_win32.c, src/structs.h
*** ../vim-8.0.0050/src/os_win32.c 2016-10-27 16:46:49.419993332 +0200
--- src/os_win32.c 2016-10-27 21:11:18.23
Patch 8.0.0050
Problem:An exiting job is detected with a large latency.
Solution: Check for pending job more often. (Ozaki Kiichi) Change the
double loop in mch_inchar() into one.
Files: src/channel.c, src/os_unix.c, src/testdir/shared.vim,
src/testdir/test_chan
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Bram,
> the attached patch fixes #1092. This happens since patch 7.4.792 which
> resets prev_syntax_id to zero, whenever a match ends within a portion of
> concealed text. I think that part was not supposed to be there from the
> beginning, so remove it. I attache a
Patch 8.0.0049
Problem:When a match ends in part of concealed text highlighting, it might
mess up concealing by resetting prev_syntax_id.
Solution: Do not reset prev_syntax_id and add a test to verify. (Christian
Brabandt, closes #1092)
Files: src/screen.c, src/t
On 2016-10-27, 11:58 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Ohhh, so that's what you mean. Well, here is another try: Not
> being imitated, or not being a copycat himself, don't
> necessarily mean that Dr. Chip is wrong, especially with Vim,
> which prides himself about allowing the users to obtain the
I wrote:
> Patch 8.0.0048
> Problem:On Windows job_stop() stops cmd.exe, not the processes it runs.
> (Linwei)
> Solution: Iterate over all processes and terminate the one where the parent
> is the job process. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes #1184)
> Files: src/os_
Patch 8.0.0048
Problem:On Windows job_stop() stops cmd.exe, not the processes it runs.
(Linwei)
Solution: Iterate over all processes and terminate the one where the parent
is the job process. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes #1184)
Files: src/os_win32.c, src/structs.h
Patch 8.0.0047
Problem:Crash when using the preview window from an unnamed buffer.
(lifepillar)
Solution: Do not clear the wrong buffer. (closes #1200)
Files: src/popupmnu.c
*** ../vim-8.0.0046/src/popupmnu.c 2016-08-29 22:42:20.0 +0200
--- src/popupmnu.c
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> Hi ChrisBra, Lifepillar and list,
>
> 2016-10-27(Thu) 5:19:43 UTC+9 Christian Brabandt:
> > If that is really the case, I wonder if we can't just get rid of those
> > lines https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/src/popupmnu.c#L585-L593
That means we keep adding buffe
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-10-26, 22:23 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>> Don't make the too frequent error to believe that everyone
>> else, or at least most of them, has the same preferences as
>> you. The fact that we hardly ever see a post about whether or
>> not
13 matches
Mail list logo