I got around to quite a bit of experimenting today, and I am getting
inconsistent results. I apologize, but I didn't set up a case testing
scenario to clearly and unambiguously sort out the behavior.
My test-beds for gvim --clean -R filename and gvim filename in Powershell.
In Windows 10 the
Patch 8.2.1456
Problem:MS-Windows: test files are not deleted.
Solution: use "del" instead of $(DEL).
Files: src/testdir/Make_dos.mak
*** ../vim-8.2.1455/src/testdir/Make_dos.mak2020-08-14 19:20:19.790506736
+0200
--- src/testdir/Make_dos.mak2020-08-14 23:06:50.447082524
Patch 8.2.1455
Problem:Vim9: crash when using typecast before constant.
Solution: Generate constant before checking type. Add tets.
Files: src/vim9compile.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1454/src/vim9compile.c 2020-08-14 22:16:29.586423086 +0200
---
Patch 8.2.1454
Problem:Vim9: failure invoking lambda with wrong arguments.
Solution: Handle invalid arguments. Add a test.
Files: src/vim9compile.c, src/vim9execute.c,
src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1453/src/vim9compile.c 2020-08-14 21:42:50.823581047
Patch 8.2.1453
Problem:Vim9: failure to compile lambda not tested.
Solution: Add a test case.
Files: src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1452/src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim 2020-08-14
21:27:34.097321673 +0200
--- src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim 2020-08-14
Patch 8.2.1452
Problem:Vim9: dead code in to_name_end().
Solution: Remove check for lambda and dict, it won't be used.
Files: src/vim9compile.c
*** ../vim-8.2.1451/src/vim9compile.c 2020-08-13 22:47:20.373992741 +0200
--- src/vim9compile.c 2020-08-14 21:41:35.460062535 +0200
Patch 8.2.1451
Problem:Vim9: list type at script level only uses first item.
Solution: Use all members, like in a compiled function. (closes #6712)
Also for dictionary.
Files: src/vim9type.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_expr.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1450/src/vim9type.c
Patch 8.2.1450
Problem:Vim9: no check that script-local items don't become global.
Solution: Add a test.
Files: src/testdir/test_vim9_script.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1449/src/testdir/test_vim9_script.vim2020-08-14
17:08:12.008859508 +0200
--- src/testdir/test_vim9_script.vim
Patch 8.2.1449
Problem:Some test makefiles delete files that are not generated.
Solution: Remove the deletion commands.
Files: src/testdir/Make_dos.mak, src/testdir/Make_ming.mak,
src/testdir/Make_amiga.mak, src/testdir/Make_vms.mms
***
Patch 8.2.1448
Problem:Test 77a for VMS depends on small.vim which does not exist.
Solution: Use the 'silent while 0" trick. (issue #6696)
Files: src/testdir/test77a.in
*** ../vim-8.2.1447/src/testdir/test77a.in 2014-03-12 15:55:50.0
+0100
--- src/testdir/test77a.in
Patch 8.2.1447
Problem:Vim9: return type of keys() is list.
Solution: Should be list. (closes #6711)
Files: src/evalfunc.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_func.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1446/src/evalfunc.c 2020-08-12 21:34:43.266489468 +0200
--- src/evalfunc.c 2020-08-14
Patch 8.2.1446
Problem:Vim9: line number in error message is not correct.
Solution: Set SOURCING_LNUM before calling emsg(). (closes #6708)
Files: src/vim9execute.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_func.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.1445/src/vim9execute.c 2020-08-13 22:47:20.377992734 +0200
---
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 00:44, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Doug Kearns wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that most of the ftplugins that support browsefilter don't
> > test for the "gui_gtk" feature.
> >
> > Is there a process in place for executing bulk ftplugin updates in a case
> > like this or should I
Patch 8.2.1445
Problem:Vim9: function expanded name is cleared when sourcing a script
again.
Solution: Only clear the expanded name when deleting the function.
(closes #6707)
Files: src/userfunc.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_script.vim
***
Doug Kearns wrote:
> I've noticed that most of the ftplugins that support browsefilter don't
> test for the "gui_gtk" feature.
>
> Is there a process in place for executing bulk ftplugin updates in a case
> like this or should I just contact all the maintainers?
I'm afraid contacting the
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:36 PM John Sellers wrote:
>
> This is happening on my new month year old computer as well as my 10+ year
> old computer.
>
> The behavior is exactly the same on both computers when using Gvim to open a
> .txt file. (I have not checked other kinds of files).
>
> While
This is happening on my new month year old computer as well as my 10+ year
old computer.
The behavior is exactly the same on both computers when using Gvim to open
a .txt file. (I have not checked other kinds of files).
While looking at the file in a Windows explorer directory in detail
G'day all,
I've noticed that most of the ftplugins that support browsefilter don't
test for the "gui_gtk" feature.
Is there a process in place for executing bulk ftplugin updates in a case
like this or should I just contact all the maintainers?
Thanks,
Doug
--
--
You received this message
18 matches
Mail list logo