> > One thing I'm not yet sure about is the declaration. Currently it works
> > like this:
> >
> > this.name: string
> > this.gender: Gender
> >
> > Notice that there is no "var" keyword. It's not needed to recognize the
> > declaration. I can't think of a good reason to add "v
Yegappan wrote:
> With the latest Vim version (patch 9.0.1093), when sourcing the
> following script:
Should be fixed by patch 9.0.1093.
--
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift.
That's why it is called 'present'.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www
> On Sunday, 25 December 2022 at 02:34:35 UTC+11 Doug Kearns wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 00:33, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> One thing I'm not yet sure about is the declaration. Currently it works
> >> like this:
> >>
> >> this.name: string
> >> this.gender: Gend
Yegappan wrote:
> Sourcing the following script:
>
> -
> vim9script
>
> class MyCar
> public this.make: string
>
> def new(make_arg: string)
> this.make = make_arg
> enddef
>
> def GetMake()
>
Patch 9.0.1094
Problem:Compiler warning when HAS_MESSAGE_WINDOW is not defined.
Solution: Add UNUSED.
Files: src/vim9cmds.c
*** ../vim-9.0.1093/src/vim9cmds.c 2022-12-18 21:42:49.014716925 +
--- src/vim9cmds.c 2022-12-25 15:57:29.986071942 +
***
*** 1973
Hi Bram,
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 7:02 AM Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>
> Yegappan wrote:
>
> > With the latest Vim version (patch 9.0.1093), when sourcing the
> > following script:
>
> Should be fixed by patch 9.0.1093.
>
This issue is not fixed by 9.0.1093. I still see the ASAN traceback
when sour
Yegappan wrote:
> > > With the latest Vim version (patch 9.0.1093), when sourcing the
> > > following script:
> >
> > Should be fixed by patch 9.0.1093.
>
> This issue is not fixed by 9.0.1093. I still see the ASAN traceback
> when sourcing the script.
I tried with valgrind. There is an erro
Patch 9.0.1095
Problem:Using freed memory when declaration fails. (Yegappan Lakshmanan)
Solution: After unreferencing an object set the reference to NULL.
Files: src/typval.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim
*** ../vim-9.0.1094/src/typval.c2022-12-08 20:41:55.433288306 +
With 9.0.1094, in the script that follows, attempting to read a
classMember through an instance fails;
echomsg c.classMember
should it? I suppose requiring the class name makes it most clear, but I
recall
mention that classnames can get long. I suppose a getter could be added.
Can a class
Patch 9.0.1096
Problem:Reallocating hashtab when the size didn't change.
Solution: Bail out when the hashtab is already the desired size.
Files: src/hashtab.c
*** ../vim-9.0.1095/src/hashtab.c 2022-11-25 16:31:46.964606667 +
--- src/hashtab.c 2022-12-25 20:37:49.49926
> With 9.0.1094, in the script that follows, attempting to read a
> classMember through an instance fails;
>
> echomsg c.classMember
>
> should it?
No, an object does not provide a class member.
> I suppose requiring the class name makes it most clear, but I recall
> mention that classna
Patch 9.0.1097 (after 9.0.1096)
Problem:Tests are failing.
Solution: Do clean up a hashtab when at the initial size.
Files: src/hashtab.c
*** ../vim-9.0.1096/src/hashtab.c 2022-12-25 20:46:07.527246097 +
--- src/hashtab.c 2022-12-25 21:28:41.970208660 +
**
On 22/12/25 1:07 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
With 9.0.1094, in the script that follows, attempting to read a
classMember through an instance fails;
echomsg c.classMember
should it?
No, an object does not provide a class member.
I suppose requiring the class name makes it most clear, but
On Monday, 26 December 2022 at 09:08:22 UTC+11 err...@raelity.com wrote:
> On 22/12/25 1:07 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> With 9.0.1094, in the script that follows, attempting to read a
> classMember through an instance fails;
>
> echomsg c.classMember
>
> should it?
>
> No, an object does
On 22/12/25 2:54 PM, Christopher Plewright wrote:
On Monday, 26 December 2022 at 09:08:22 UTC+11 err...@raelity.com wrote:
On 22/12/25 1:07 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
With 9.0.1094, in the script that follows, attempting to read a
classMember through an instance fails;
e
>
>
> > I thought that the declaration would be like this;
> >
> > this.name : *string *= "Somebody"
> >
> > Or is auto-type detection at play here too?
>
> It's called type inference. The type of the expression is used as the
> type of the variable. In most cases this works very well, keeps
On Monday, 26 December 2022 at 10:26:50 UTC+11 err...@raelity.com wrote:
> On 22/12/25 2:54 PM, Christopher Plewright wrote:
>
> I didn't know it was documented that there could be a static class
> function. The whole point of the question was to determine if there could
> be a static class fu
17 matches
Mail list logo
