On 2023-08-13 09:51, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Sa, 12 Aug 2023, Ben Fritz wrote:
Hello everyone!
Christian helpfully CC'd me on his email thread to the list about "The
future of the Vim project". I replied by email a few hours ago with a
lengthy post, but it still hasn't appeared on the web
On 2023-08-11 20:57, Yee Cheng Chin wrote:
One thing I need to point out is that WASM is not a replacement for
vim9script / vimscript. Remember, the vast majority of people writing
vimscript are just doing it in their vimrc, writing colorschemes, and
whatnot. No one (ok, some of you will) will wr
On 2023-08-10 18:21, dkearns wrote:
These multiline autocommands should probably use blocks now. See :help
:autocmd-block
Good point. I just made a note to revisit this vimcode and submit the
changes as a pull request, after I set up everything on my side to be
able to use GitHub.
--
--
Yo
On 2023-08-10 07:14, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
On 2023-08-10 06:49, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 09 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
Save and restore the view position before and after saving the
buffer,
respectively, to keep the current view of t
On 2023-08-10 06:49, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 09 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
Save and restore the view position before and after saving the buffer,
respectively, to keep the current view of the xxd(1)'s hex dump
unchanged after doing ":w", wh
Using xxd(1) to filter and edit binary files causes the input files
to have dual nature, so to speak, which effectively makes restoring
the cursor position broken. Fix that by ignoring the "xxd" file type
in the code that restores the cursor position.
Interactive rebasing in git causes files to
Save and restore the view position before and after saving the buffer,
respectively, to keep the current view of the xxd(1)'s hex dump
unchanged after doing ":w", which previously caused the window to
scroll back to the very beginning of the buffer. I believe it's
needless to say how annoying and
On 2023-08-09 16:04, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 09 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
Ah, I think I know another file type that shouldn't have the cursor
position
restored. :) It's "gitrebase", which is, quite similarly to
"gitcommit",
On 2023-08-09 10:46, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
On 2023-08-08 20:55, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Di, 08 Aug 2023, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2023-08-08 20:15, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 08 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
>
> > diff
On 2023-08-09 12:13, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 09 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
Would you like me to extend the patch and resend it, to cover
runtime/defaults.vim as well?
Yes please. Do you mind to create this as a PR please if possible?
Thanks, I'll
On 2023-08-08 20:55, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Di, 08 Aug 2023, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2023-08-08 20:15, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 08 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt b/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt
> > index
On 2023-08-09 07:18, Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 12:57 PM Christian Brabandt
wrote:
On Di, 08 Aug 2023, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> patch 9.0.1679: Cleanup Tests from leftover files
Sorry, trying to get the patch mails working.
While this seems to fix the recent
May you rest peacefully, Bram. You started and continued doing a
monumental thing for the humanity.
No matter how sad this moment is, let it remind us that the good things
we do in our lives are important. Human lives are extremely fragile, so
let's do our best while we all are able to.
--
On 2023-08-08 20:15, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Di, 08 Aug 2023, 'Dragan Simic' via vim_dev wrote:
diff --git a/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt b/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt
index bc68e61b8..acc0f0c6b 100644
--- a/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/usr_05.txt
@@ -308,10 +308,14 @@ This s
This version saves and restores the view position while saving the
buffer, to keep the current view unchanged after doing ":w", which
previously caused the window to scroll back to the very beginning of
the buffer. I believe it's needles to say how annoying and actually
counterproductive that was
Thanks to the input file's dual nature, so to speak, using xxd(1)
to filter and edit binary files makes restoring the cursor position
broken. Fix that by ignoring the appropriate file type in the code
that restores the cursor position.
While there, refactor the code a bit to save a few CPU cycle
16 matches
Mail list logo
