On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Nikolai Weibull n...@bitwi.se wrote:
I figured that “That said, I think persistent undo is more or less
useless and, well, just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent
undo is in the version control system, not in the editor.” is me
stating an opinion
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
As you may have noticed, I have added the persistent undo patch
yesterday. The core of this was done by Jordan Lewis.
This means you can make changes to a file, quit Vim, edit that same file
and undo the previous
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Tony Mechelynck
antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/05/10 22:30, Jordan Lewis wrote:
[...]
I am a bit concerned with your decision to write undo files to the
current directory by default, though. I think that it is impolite to
users to have Vim store
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, James Vega james...@jamessan.com wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
I suppose the argument could be made that the user who has added undo
persistence to her vimrc would have read enough
. I believe that this requirement, although trivial,
constitutes a restriction upon further dissemination, which removes it from
the public domain classification.
I am similarly NAL, though.
- Jordan Lewis
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
With hard link it's harder (impossible?) to determine what the 'target'
is based on their file names because of ambiguity: one hardlink is no
different than another - they are all first class 'file names'.
You're right,
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.orgwrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Today it's the first time I tested this
feature. This is really awesome and I have been missing it so much. I
already started testing it. There are some issues I already noticed:
1)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Ernie Rael e...@raelity.com wrote:
On 4/13/2010 5:49 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3?
I do like the functionality of this patch, but this is something that
requires a lot of testing
Any thoughts about including persistent undo in Vim 7.3? It's being
maintained in Markus Heidelberg's vim_extended repository here
http://repo.or.cz/w/vim_extended.git/shortlog/refs/heads/feat/persistent-undo.
It's also the 3rd most popular new feature on the new feature voting list.
- Jordan
and the rest of the Vim
community will really like this functionality.
Thanks,
Jordan Lewis
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Nov 16, 10:49 am, Erik Falor ewfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry to report that your patch does not build on Windows with
VS2008.
Thanks for that input - I've only tested the patch under Linux and Mac
OS X. I don't actually have a Windows development environment
available to me at the
2009/11/16 Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
Hi,
I've added some documentation to the patch I wrote for persistent
undo. It's been a while since I've posted about this, so I'll recap
the features:
1. New option 'undofile' causes Vim to automatically write out
On Feb 23, 4:51 am, Andreas Bernauer vim-de...@lysium.de wrote:
2. Added 'undofile'/'udf' option that toggles automatic undo file
writing and reading. If a file's checksum changed since the last time
it had an undo file written for it, Vim will silently (or loudly, with
verbose
within zip archives, and the undo file
mechanism somehow mismatches these representations. I am unfamiliar
with the mechanics of Vim's zip file support, so I thought I would ask
the list for advice on how to fix this issue.
Comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
- Jordan Lewis
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jordan Lewis wrote:
* Undo persistence - save a representation of the tree to a file on
or before exit
This would be really nice. But it's very likely too much work for the
SoC. Especially because it must work very reliably.
I have been thinking
Hello Vimmers,
My name is Jordan Lewis, and I am applying to Vim for Google's Summer
of Code this year. I am a first year student at the University of
Chicago (and a Vim addict). I am planning to work on some of the items
in todo.txt like the ideas page suggests, and I wanted to get some
16 matches
Mail list logo
