Hello,
The subject is self-explanatory. I use Vim 7.4.052. Steps to
reproduce:
vim -u NONE
Enter the text below:
(foo "foo bar")
Put cursor on the first 'foo' and try '[('. It works. Put cursor on the
second foo and try '[(' once again. It still works. Let's switch to
'nocompatible' mode:
:set
Hello,
I use Vim 7.4.052.
Help says that is "like CTRL-O but don't move the cursor",
but:
vim -u NONE
:set nocp
:set ruler
:set ft=cpp
:set formatoptions+=r
Put the text below:
}//foo
You should have:
//foo
//|}
where '|' indicates cursor position.
Look at the ruler, the cursor position is
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:36:28 PM UTC+2, ZyX wrote:
> > But let us assume for a moment that this behaviour is correct. Then:
>
> >
>
> > :buffer bar
>
> >
>
> > should display analogous results (because 'bar' is a substring in the
>
> > absolute path for all files). That is:
>
>
Hello,
I use Vim 7.4.5. Let me start with some prerequisities:
~ $ mkdir foobar
~ $ cd foobar
~/foobar $ touch foo bar baz
~/foobar $ vim -u NONE foo bar baz
Now, make the observation that:
:ls
1 %a "foo" line 1
2 "bar"
I use Vim 7.3.715. Let's create sample fold:
vim -u NONE -N
:set foldmethod=marker
i
{{{1
foo bar zaz
foo bar zazgg0za
Let's try search for 'foo': '/foo'. Fold will open and cursor will
be placed at the beginning of 'foo'. Great. Now, let's go back where
we started with 'gg0', close the fold wit
