On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:22:34AM -0700, ZyX wrote:
It works from inside expression mappings, like
nnoremap expr GG :echom .screenrow(). .screencol().\n
. I believe it is fine and correct behavior: always reporting
real cursor position. Not very convenient, but correct, and
completely
Simon Ruderich wrote:
Thanks for the hint. Attached is a testcase which ports my old
tests to use your suggestion.
I noticed that screencol()/screenrow() start from zero while the
other *col() functions start from one. Should I update my
screencol()/screenrow() patch?
Yes, it would be
Simon Ruderich wrote:
[...]
There is a patch pending which fixes those alignment issues among other
problems (whether Vim uses conceal feature or not).
Thanks for pointing me to this patch. It fixes a few tab related
issues I just noticed (and tried to fix - you saved me some time,
Simon Ruderich wrote:
diff --git a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt b/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
index 7a5fa04..fe77265 100644
--- a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Name triggered by ~
Reading
|BufNewFile| starting to edit
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:46:00PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Thanks for pointing me to this patch. It fixes a few tab related
issues I just noticed (and tried to fix - you saved me some time,
thanks).
Which patch is that, who sent it?
It's Dominique Pellé's patch:
I tried to add the functions (patch attached - as I'm new to Vim
internals, please tell me if that's the correct way to do it),
but there is one major problem. screen_cur_col and screen_cur_row
report the current cursor position - which is of course the
command line where the current command
Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:46:00PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Thanks for pointing me to this patch. It fixes a few tab related
issues I just noticed (and tried to fix - you saved me some time,
thanks).
Which patch is that, who sent it?
It's Dominique
Charles Campbell wrote:
Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:46:00PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Thanks for pointing me to this patch. It fixes a few tab related
issues I just noticed (and tried to fix - you saved me some time,
thanks).
Which patch is that, who sent it?
It's
---
runtime/doc/autocmd.txt | 28 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt b/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
index 7a5fa04..fe77265 100644
--- a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Name
Simon Ruderichwrote:
---
runtime/doc/autocmd.txt | 28 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt b/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
index 7a5fa04..fe77265 100644
--- a/runtime/doc/autocmd.txt
+++
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Dominique Pellé wrote:
Hi Simon
I can see why you want to patch this, but I think that the patch should
not be applied. It's a work around for a bug in Vim. It's also breaking
indentation when using set concealllevel=0 or when conceal feature
is not
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/testdir/test88.ok
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
[snip]
+[8;1H
+[8;9H
+[8;17H
+[8;25H
+[8;26H
+[24;1H
:q-
+[24;1H -
Hm, looks like the patch was mangled. In both marked spots (-)
there's a ^M (\r) missing at the end-of-line.
Regards,
Simon
12 matches
Mail list logo
