Re: [patch] UTF-8: mapping a multi-byte key where the second byte is 0x80 doesn't appear

Condition is good now. I came back to take the respoisibility. To study the Vim script a little bit. I submit the patch and test. I weaken the power of my shoulders. Hello again. Nobuhiro Takasaki -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your

Re: [patch] UTF-8: mapping a multi-byte key where the second byte is 0x80 doesn't appear

There was not a clear answer. I do not write tests. I seem to get into too deep. Control of schizophrenia is difficult. It was a little worse. >From now on, live quietly while the care of the parent. Thank you for a good dream. Good bye. Nobuhiro Takasaki -- -- You received this mess

Re: [patch] UTF-8: mapping a multi-byte key where the second byte is 0x80 doesn't appear

The patch, I should have been in the attached file. I have to use the two pointers. I do not have the ability to write this test. I study, but amateur. I can see maybe grammar, thinking how to do well. Anyway, I've got a patch that fixes my mistakes. Does not seem to be an easy road in life. -

Re: [patch] UTF-8: mapping a multi-byte key where the second byte is 0x80 doesn't appear

Nobuhiro Takasaki wrote: > It is a thing that this also solved the Issues of Japanese. > > I will read through the TODO after this. I fun. > > https://gist.github.com/ntak/8936239 I would prefer the patch in the email message, so that I don't need to navigate to a web page to see what it's abo

[patch] UTF-8: mapping a multi-byte key where the second byte is 0x80 doesn't appear

It is a thing that this also solved the Issues of Japanese. I will read through the TODO after this. I fun. https://gist.github.com/ntak/8936239 Thanks. Nobuhiro Takasaki -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you