I'm not talking about how you can do it. And I don't hope to discuss
about MapSort. We should discuss how sort function is improvable to do
it without copying your MapSort every time.
On 10/16/14, Andy Wokula wrote:
> Am 22.08.2014 um 02:05 schrieb mattn:
>> It need to do like below with MapSort(
Am 22.08.2014 um 02:05 schrieb mattn:
It need to do like below with MapSort()
echo MapSort([{"foo":{"bar": "3"}}, {"foo":{"bar": "3 0"}}], '0 +
v:val["foo"]["bar"]')
If using my patch, it is possible easy to avoid this.
:echo sort(["3 0", "3 0 1"], "a:lhs < a:rhs")
I suppose your examples s
John Little wrote:
> On Friday, August 22, 2014 12:05:33 PM UTC+12, mattn wrote:
> > > Bug in sort() function?
> >
> > See :help sort()
> >
> > > The sort is stable, items which compare equal (as number or as...
>
> There is indeed a bug in sort(). The stability of the sort is not relevant.
>
On Friday, August 22, 2014 12:05:33 PM UTC+12, mattn wrote:
> > Bug in sort() function?
>
> See :help sort()
>
> > The sort is stable, items which compare equal (as number or as...
There is indeed a bug in sort(). The stability of the sort is not relevant.
I haven't been following the thread to
> > We need to escape string to avoid to handle index as value.
> I don't think so.
> > I don't want to need to provide this function in all plugins. Just
> > want to get it in official sort function.
> The reason is:
> :echo sort(['3 0', '3 0 1'])
> ['3 0 1', '3 0']
> I'd expect ['3 0', '3
Am 21.08.2014 um 03:50 schrieb mattn:
About making list sorted by string of one of value.
echo "3" < "3 0"
This is TRUE, then:
echo MapSort([{"foo":{"bar": "3"}}, {"foo":{"bar": "3 0"}}],
'v:val["foo"]["bar"]')
We expecet it should be kept:
[{"foo":{"bar": "3"}}, {"foo":{"bar": "3 0"}}]
But
About making list sorted by string of one of value.
echo "3" < "3 0"
This is TRUE, then:
echo MapSort([{"foo":{"bar": "3"}}, {"foo":{"bar": "3 0"}}],
'v:val["foo"]["bar"]')
We expecet it should be kept:
[{"foo":{"bar": "3"}}, {"foo":{"bar": "3 0"}}]
But results are:
[{'foo': {'bar': '3 0'}}
Am 19.08.2014 um 11:17 schrieb mattn:
Keys? v:key is list index, it cannot contain spaces.
Spaces in values shouldn't matter.
Not sure what you mean.
I wonder this won't works correctly.
[{"a": "b"}, {"a b": ""}]
Guessing you want to sort by dict key:
:echo MapSort([{"a": "b"}, {"a b":
> Keys? v:key is list index, it cannot contain spaces.
> Spaces in values shouldn't matter.
> Not sure what you mean.
I wonder this won't works correctly.
[{"a": "b"}, {"a b": ""}]
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
Am 06.11.2013 02:16, schrieb mattn:
When keys or values contains space letter, I wonder it works
correctly.
Keys? v:key is list index, it cannot contain spaces.
Spaces in values shouldn't matter.
Not sure what you mean.
--
Andy
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do
When keys or values contains space letter, I wonder it works correctly.
On Monday, November 4, 2013 2:39:26 AM UTC+9, Andy Wokula wrote:
> Am 31.05.2013 15:14, schrieb mattn:
>
> > :echo sort([{"foo":3},{"foo":2},{"foo":4}], "v:lhs.foo - v:rhs.foo")
>
>
>
> What I use:
>
>
>
> " (copy) sort
Am 31.05.2013 15:14, schrieb mattn:
:echo sort([{"foo":3},{"foo":2},{"foo":4}], "v:lhs.foo - v:rhs.foo")
What I use:
" (copy) sort {list} by comparing strings obtained with {selexpr}
func! MapSort(list, selexpr)
" {list} list to sort
" {selexpr}(string) expression to get a st
> Another benefit would be (as I remember) that it would be possible to
> pass around Funcrefs to script-local functions and be able to just
> invoke them in any scope without the current workarounds of expanding .
Not this. Workaround with expanding was merged AFAIR and it does not
matter much
On 31-May-2013 21:27 +0200, ZyX wrote:
>> Using strings here was just a quick way of making it work. What we
>> would really need is some kind of lambda function. So the argument
>> would be one of three types:
>> expression - mainly for backwards compatibility, but also allows
>>
> Using strings here was just a quick way of making it work. What we
> would really need is some kind of lambda function. So the argument
> would be one of three types:
> expression - mainly for backwards compatibility, but also allows
>building the functionality from pi
пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 20:39:15 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
> In addional, my patch don't remove feature that passing 'func name'.
It would be better if it removed it. As I said, do make the difference between
sort(list, 'Func') and sort(list, '{expr}') defined explicitely: sort(list,
'{
ZyX wrote:
> пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 17:14:17 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But
> > sort() is given function name or funcref for that.
> > I hope to give expression to {func}.
> >
> > I guess this is
Not having read the implemeentation details:
using expressions you can have "closures", using functions this is harder and
requires much more typing. Whether this is important for sorting, I
don't know.
let sort_opts = {'ignore_spaces': 1}
sort(foo, 'sort_stuff(v:1, v:2, sort_opts)')
try the sam
In addional, my patch don't remove feature that passing 'func name'.
On 6/1/13, ZyX wrote:
> пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 17:14:17 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But
>> sort() is given function name or funcref fo
Well, I do not want to define the function each time for sort. This is
the opinion of the user.
On 6/1/13, ZyX wrote:
> пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 17:14:17 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But
>> sort() is given
пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 17:14:17 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
> Hi all.
>
> filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But
> sort() is given function name or funcref for that.
> I hope to give expression to {func}.
>
> I guess this is useful to call sort().
>
> :
On 31-May-2013 15:14 +0200, mattn wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But
> sort() is given function name or funcref for that.
> I hope to give expression to {func}.
>
> I guess this is useful to call sort().
>
> :echo sort([{"foo":3},{"foo
Hi all.
filter() or map() is given {string} expression to compare the items. But sort()
is given function name or funcref for that.
I hope to give expression to {func}.
I guess this is useful to call sort().
:echo sort([{"foo":3},{"foo":2},{"foo":4}], "v:lhs.foo - v:rhs.foo")
[{'foo': 2}, {'foo
23 matches
Mail list logo
