Re: Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

Sorry for the confusion; I wasn't expecting anything. I was merely stating that ligature support for monospace tyoefaces involves are much more than what conceal & etc. provide up to this point. On Monday, October 19, 2015, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Am 2015-10-18 23:02,

Re: Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

Great, if Vim doesn't support non-monos pace typefaces, it seems even less barriers for ligatures to be supported (those users don't exist) Ligatures with monospace typefaces are especially valuable for languages with functional capabilities such as Haskell & modern (ES6) JavaScript. On

Re: Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

I & many are expect true ligature support by enabling them to be used JIT rather than add anything to vimrc other than to turn them off for those who are *not* using monospace typefaces for whatever reason & don't want such typefaces have their ligatures activated that are not oriented for

Re: Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Kevin Lozandier wrote: > I & many are expect true ligature support by enabling them to be used JIT > rather than add anything to vimrc other than to turn them off for those who > are *not* using monospace typefaces for whatever reason &

Re: Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 11:13:03 AM UTC+2, Kevin Lozandier wrote: > Ligature support being added to Vim I highly recommend being pursued more > than ever. > > Mainstream monospace fonts are now supporting ligatures that add sensible & > rational value to everyday programmers. > >

Feature Request: Formal support for Ligatures.

Ligature support being added to Vim I highly recommend being pursued more than ever. Mainstream monospace fonts are now supporting ligatures that add sensible & rational value to everyday programmers. Montotype fonts with ligatures allow programmers to more clearly see the intent of typed