Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-10-24 Fir de Conversatie vim
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #9 on issue 215 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 This problem has been fixed awhile back. Just closing it now. -- You received this

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-09 Fir de Conversatie vim
Updates: Status: Started Owner: drc...@campbellfamily.biz Comment #6 on issue 215 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 Please try syntax/sh.vim v133, available at my

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-09 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #7 on issue 215 by gary@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 Thanks for the new version. With syntax/sh.vim v133, the line FOO.BAR=hello (without the quotes) has only BAR highlighted.

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-09 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #8 on issue 215 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 Thanks, Gary -- I'm not sure why that comma was there, even for the ksh/posix shells. So, its gone! Well, in v134,

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-08 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #1 on issue 215 by john.b.l...@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 The Korn shell has . in variable names; bash doesn't AFAICT, but sh.vim anticipates the problem: if you put this in your

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-08 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #2 on issue 215 by gary@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 Setting g:sh_noisk doesn't seem to affect the syntax highlighting of '.' using Vim 7.4.236 and syntax/sh.vim version 132.

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-08 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #3 on issue 215 by ewtoo...@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 The Korn shell has . in variable names; bash doesn't AFAICT, but sh.vim anticipates the problem: if you put this in your

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-08 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #4 on issue 215 by john.b.l...@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 Gary commented: Setting g:sh_noisk doesn't seem to affect the syntax highlighting of '.' using Vim 7.4.236 and

Re: Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-08 Fir de Conversatie vim
Comment #5 on issue 215 by gary@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 I tested it two ways: using my standard setup, which includes the setting of g:sh_noisk in my .vimrc, and the following

Issue 215 in vim: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names.

2014-04-07 Fir de Conversatie vim
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 215 by ewtoo...@gmail.com: ft=sh highlighting thinks . is a valid character in variable names. http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215 What steps will reproduce the problem? 0. Start vim without a configuration: