I can confirm that Patch 2 fixes this! Thanks so much! Seriously!
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:45:52 AM UTC-7, Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
Just curious if any headway has been made on this lookbehind regex issue?
I only ask because it breaks a pretty popular JS syntax plugin.
On Tuesday,
Just curious if any headway has been made on this lookbehind regex issue?
I only ask because it breaks a pretty popular JS syntax plugin.
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 5:34:52 PM UTC-7, Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
Alright, so I am admittedly terrible with Regexes, but I think I did find
something.
With the update to vim 7.4, it seems as if this particular regex just doesn't
match in particular cases in 7.4, but it worked fine in 7.3.
syntax region jsRegexpString
start=+\(\(\(return\|case\)\s\+\)\@=\|\(\([)\]']\|\d\|\w\)\s*\)\@!\)/\(\*\|/\)\@!+
skip=+\|\\/+ end=+/[gimy]\{,4}+
Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
With the update to vim 7.4, it seems as if this particular regex just
doesn't match in particular cases in 7.4, but it worked fine in 7.3.
syntax region jsRegexpString
start=+\(\(\(return\|case\)\s\+\)\@=\|\(\([)\]']\|\d\|\w\)\s*\)\@!\)/\(\*\|/\)\@!+
I am pretty bad with regex stuff, but I will try to figure out how to isolate
it.
I posted it here quickly just in case there was something silly I was missing
in that snippet.
For what it's worth, it's used in this syntax plugin:
http://github.com/pangloss/vim-javascript
And setting the
Alright, so I am admittedly terrible with Regexes, but I think I did find
something.
Using this file for the regex test:
https://gist.github.com/amadeus/82d0288a9b8b2e3ff2a9
And using this regex in search, with hlsearch on:
\(\(\(return\|case\)\s\+\)\@=\|\(\([)\]']\|\d\|\w\)\s*\)\@!\)\/
Both
