Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Markus Heidelberg
Richard Hartmann, 30.06.2008: > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would > > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, > > to all those patches f

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Markus Heidelberg
Christian MICHON, 30.06.2008: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tony Mechelynck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem with patches is bit-rot. Scripts will usually remain valid, > > even when unattended; patches must be cared for, or after some time they > > won't apply anymore. > > >

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would > > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, > > to all those patches from dif

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Christian MICHON
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tony Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with patches is bit-rot. Scripts will usually remain valid, > even when unattended; patches must be cared for, or after some time they > won't apply anymore. > you can avoid bitrotting provided you can rebas

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 30/06/08 12:53, Ben Schmidt wrote: >> I would >> like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, >> to all those patches from different sources for different purposes and >> needs, that are not *yet* on the mainline or for some reasons they will >> never be. >> >> T

RE: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie John Beckett
Ben Schmidt wrote: >> As a host I would suggest code google [6], as it has svn access, >> an issue tracker and a wiki. A link to this project from the >> official vim site, will be appropriate (with the usual warnings), >> although not strictly necessary. > > I too have been thinking for some ti

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Ben Schmidt
> I would > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, > to all those patches from different sources for different purposes and > needs, that are not *yet* on the mainline or for some reasons they will > never be. > > This will help: > > - to redirect people

Re: Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-30 Fir de Conversatie Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:02, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would > like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, > to all those patches from different sources for different purpose

Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]

2008-06-29 Fir de Conversatie Ag. D. Hatzimanikas
On Sun, Jun 29, at 03:19 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Richard - > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:23, Markus Heidelberg > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have adapted my relativenumber patch to Vim 7.2a, initial version > > > was from 21.02.2008. Unfortunately it didn't get into mainlin