Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
2016-02-22 22:17 GMT+03:00 Charles Campbell : > Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> Right, the name is not ideal, but I could not think of a better one. I >> would also use "bundle" instead of package or pack, but plugin >> managers already use it and there could be a conflict. I

Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Justin M. Keyes
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Charles Campbell wrote: > Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> Right, the name is not ideal, but I could not think of a better one. I >> would also use "bundle" instead of package or pack, but plugin >> managers already use it and there could be a

Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Right, the name is not ideal, but I could not think of a better one. I > would also use "bundle" instead of package or pack, but plugin > managers already use it and there could be a conflict. I hope that the > new mechanism doesn't break existing behavior. Nikolay, you had

Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
2016-02-22 12:05 GMT+03:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > >> 2016-02-22 5:08 GMT+03:00 Manuel Ortega : >> > I know that loadplugins in an option while loadplugin is a command, but >> > surely there is a better name for the new command. This

Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-22 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > 2016-02-22 5:08 GMT+03:00 Manuel Ortega : > > I know that loadplugins in an option while loadplugin is a command, but > > surely there is a better name for the new command. This is just > > gratuitously confusing. > > > > What's wrong with

Re: Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-21 Fir de Conversatie Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
2016-02-22 5:08 GMT+03:00 Manuel Ortega : > I know that loadplugins in an option while loadplugin is a command, but > surely there is a better name for the new command. This is just > gratuitously confusing. > > What's wrong with "loadpack" or something like that? I would

Why "loadplugin" when there's already "loadplugins"?

2016-02-21 Fir de Conversatie Manuel Ortega
I know that loadplugins in an option while loadplugin is a command, but surely there is a better name for the new command. This is just gratuitously confusing. What's wrong with "loadpack" or something like that? -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not