Here is an updated patch. Changes include a new-style test and adapted
to the recent source style changes.
Best,
Christian
--
Niederträchtigkeit der mittlern Zeit bis ins sechzehnte
Jahrhundert, treffliche Menschen wie Aristoteles, Hippokrates durch
dumme Märchen lächerlich zu machen.
Here is updated patch for 7.4.519
Best,
Christian
--
Das Fernsehen macht aus dem Kreis der Familie einen Halbkreis.
-- Robert Lembke
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
Christian wrote:
Here is updated patch for 7.4.519
Thanks, I'll update the todo list entry.
--
BLACK KNIGHT: I'm invincible!
ARTHUR: You're a looney.
Monty Python and the Holy Grail PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net --
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 07 Nov 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Okay. So here is a patch, implementing the :bvimgrep and
:bvimgrepadd commands.
Great, thanks.
I think this deserves a test. Should not be too difficult, since it's
grepping in specific buffers.
Here is an updated patch that
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 07 Nov 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Okay. So here is a patch, implementing the :bvimgrep and
:bvimgrepadd commands.
Great, thanks.
I think this deserves a test. Should not be too difficult, since it's
grepping in specific buffers.
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would be
better than overloading the existing commands:
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] [bufname]
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] N1 N2 ...
Okay. So here is a patch, implementing the :bvimgrep
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would be
better than overloading the existing commands:
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] [bufname]
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] N1 N2 ...
Okay. So here
Similarly, I feel like :`,` would be consistent with with how ' is
linewise and ` is character wise (single quote vs backtick).
On Monday, November 3, 2014 9:25:21 PM UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 29 Okt 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
It could also be a
On Mo, 03 Nov 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Nevertheless, in some cases it could still be useful. E.g. specifying
the first 100 lines could work on multiple buffers. And when selecting
a column from position 8 to the end of the line, for all lines, this
could also work in other buffers. E.g.,
Christian Wellenbrock wrote:
Similarly, I feel like :`,` would be consistent with with how '
is linewise and ` is character wise (single quote vs backtick).
True, but when you press : we can only either use ' or `. That
could depend on being on Visual block mode, but many commands that
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mi, 29 Okt 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
It could also be a solution for something that doesn't work yet: Search
within a Visual block. Since this is going to be a new command, we can
make :',' respect the Visual mode, including block. So you could
select
Hi Bram!
On Mi, 29 Okt 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
It could also be a solution for something that doesn't work yet: Search
within a Visual block. Since this is going to be a new command, we can
make :',' respect the Visual mode, including block. So you could
select a block and type
Zyx wrote:
On October 29, 2014 10:54:38 PM EAT, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net
wrote:
Christian wrote:
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would
be
better than overloading the existing commands:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-Oct-2014 12:42 +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Zyx wrote:
On October 29, 2014 10:54:38 PM EAT, Bram Moolenaar
b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Christian wrote:
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On October 29, 2014 10:54:38 PM EAT, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Christian wrote:
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would
be
better than overloading the existing
Christian wrote:
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would be
better than overloading the existing commands:
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] [bufname]
:N,Mbvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j]
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] N1
Am 2014-10-27 23:08, schrieb Bee:
On Monday, October 27, 2014 1:06:12 PM UTC-7, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Bram,
here is a patch, that allows to use
:vimgrep /foobar/
to search only the current buffer. You might want to argue this is
already possible just use '%' as the filename, but that does
On Oct 28, 2014 2:40 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
Am 2014-10-27 23:08, schrieb Bee:
Just curious...
How is that different from simply using `/` ?
Is this a `just in case` scenario?
I find it convenient to have all search results in the quickfix buffer.
It'd be even
Am 2014-10-28 12:04, schrieb James McCoy:
On Oct 28, 2014 2:40 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
Am 2014-10-27 23:08, schrieb Bee:
Just curious...
How is that different from simply using `/` ?
Is this a `just in case` scenario?
I find it convenient to have all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On October 28, 2014 3:22:58 PM EAT, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
Am 2014-10-28 12:04, schrieb James McCoy:
On Oct 28, 2014 2:40 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
Am 2014-10-27 23:08, schrieb Bee:
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-Oct-2014 15:55 +0100, Павлов Николай Александрович wrote:
On 28-Oct-2014 15:55, Павлов Николай Александрович wrote: On October
28, 2014 3:22:58 PM EAT, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
Am 2014-10-28 12:04, schrieb James McCoy:
On
On Di, 28 Okt 2014, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Well, then perhaps a separate :bvimgrep[add] set of commands would be
better than overloading the existing commands:
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] [bufname]
:N,Mbvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j]
:bvimgrep[!] /{pattern}/[g][j] N1 N2 ...
Sounds useful.
Bram,
here is a patch, that allows to use
:vimgrep /foobar/
to search only the current buffer. You might want to argue this is
already possible just use '%' as the filename, but that does not work,
if the current buffer does not have a name yet. Then vimgrep complains
about not being able to
On Monday, October 27, 2014 1:06:12 PM UTC-7, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Bram,
here is a patch, that allows to use
:vimgrep /foobar/
to search only the current buffer. You might want to argue this is
already possible just use '%' as the filename, but that does not work,
if the current
24 matches
Mail list logo
