On Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:49:25 PM UTC+9, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping syntax highlighting for docker could be included by default in
> vim. The files can be found here:
> https://github.com/docker/docker/tree/master/contrib/syntax/vim
>
> Would the BSD license cause any tr
Ben, I do see your point now. And yes, it's probably best that distros use
upstream docker's vim files itself than having those sent over here which is an
added expense.
Bram, upto you to decide the fate of docker syntax files already included.
FWIW, fedora will have a docker-io-vim
Kenichi Ito wrote:
> runtime/filetype.vim
> " Dockerfile
> au BufNewFile,BufRead Dockerfile setf=dockerfile
>
> This become
> filetype==dockerfile
>
>
> This patch fixes it.
> ---
> diff --git a/runtime/filetype.vim b/runtime/filetype.vim
> index 896ccc1..60a47e1 100644
> --- a/runtime/filetyp
runtime/filetype.vim
" Dockerfile
au BufNewFile,BufRead Dockerfile setf=dockerfile
This become
filetype==dockerfile
This patch fixes it.
---
diff --git a/runtime/filetype.vim b/runtime/filetype.vim
index 896ccc1..60a47e1 100644
--- a/runtime/filetype.vim
+++ b/runtime/filetype.vim
@@ -531,7 +531
Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Here are the docker syntax files. I added a simple note about the
> license to the main file.
I have moved setting commentstring to an ftplugin file.
I moved some lines arround in the syntax file to follow the style that
most syntax files used. And use "
Here are the docker syntax files. I added a simple note about the license to
the main file.
On Friday, August 22, 2014 5:00:43 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Honza Pokorny wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm the original author of the syntax highlighting code. I'm not sure
&g
Docker) that have Vim files would set them up in a
>> way usable by (a) Vim plugin manager(s).
>> - "Via pathogen, the usual way..."¹ seems a bit glib/useless
>>
>> #'s 1 and 2 are obviously out-of-scope for this Docker-specific
>> request. But #3
Honza Pokorny wrote:
> I'm the original author of the syntax highlighting code. I'm not sure
> if I'm in a position to make the call on this anymore.
>
> The code started out in my own repository on GitHub
>
> https://github.com/honza/dockerfile.vim
>
> But then It got included in docker prope
that have Vim files would set them up in a
> way usable by (a) Vim plugin manager(s).
> - "Via pathogen, the usual way..."¹ seems a bit glib/useless
>
> #'s 1 and 2 are obviously out-of-scope for this Docker-specific
> request. But #3 should be easily achievab
Bram,
I'm the original author of the syntax highlighting code. I'm not sure if I'm in
a position to make the call on this anymore.
The code started out in my own repository on GitHub
https://github.com/honza/dockerfile.vim
But then It got included in docker proper where others have made contri
athogen, the usual way..."¹ seems a bit glib/useless
>
> #'s 1 and 2 are obviously out-of-scope for this Docker-specific
> request. But #3 should be easily achievable, AFAICT:
>
> My preferred plugin manager, Vundle², for example, makes installing
> the Docker syntax files
failure) author.
3. Projects (like Docker) that have Vim files would set them up in a
way usable by (a) Vim plugin manager(s).
- "Via pathogen, the usual way..."¹ seems a bit glib/useless
#'s 1 and 2 are obviously out-of-scope for this Docker-specific
request. But #3 should b
Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> I was hoping syntax highlighting for docker could be included by default in
> vim. The files can be found here:
> https://github.com/docker/docker/tree/master/contrib/syntax/vim
>
> Would the BSD license cause any trouble in this matter?
I prefer the author sending the
Hi,
I was hoping syntax highlighting for docker could be included by default in
vim. The files can be found here:
https://github.com/docker/docker/tree/master/contrib/syntax/vim
Would the BSD license cause any trouble in this matter?
Thanks,
--
Lokesh
pgpeuXBUWT3pd.pgp
Description: PGP signat
14 matches
Mail list logo
