Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi vim-dev! > > On Sa, 31 Okt 2015, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > On Fr, 30 Okt 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > I suppose that for syntax highlighting using a :syntax command is > > > appropriate. For other contexts we might still want to use an actual > >

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Updated patch attached. Best, Christian -- Raketentriebwerk: gibt es in Schubladen zu kaufen -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php ---

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Hi vim-dev! On Sa, 31 Okt 2015, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Fr, 30 Okt 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > I suppose that for syntax highlighting using a :syntax command is > > appropriate. For other contexts we might still want to use an actual > > setting. > > > > Not sure about the ":syn

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

On Fr, 30 Okt 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > I suppose that for syntax highlighting using a :syntax command is > appropriate. For other contexts we might still want to use an actual > setting. > > Not sure about the ":syn option" command. Why not use ":syn iskeyword"? That was my first

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > 2015-10-27 14:44 GMT+03:00 Christian Brabandt : > > Hi, > > currently setting 'isk' option has - among others - an unwanted side > > effect on the syntax highlighting. > > > > For example by removing the '_' from the 'iskeyword' setting, defined > >

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Christian wrote: > currently setting 'isk' option has - among others - an unwanted side > effect on the syntax highlighting. > > For example by removing the '_' from the 'iskeyword' setting, defined > syntax keywords start matching where they didn't match before. > > E.g. in a SQL buffer, >

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

2015-10-27 14:44 GMT+03:00 Christian Brabandt : > Hi, > currently setting 'isk' option has - among others - an unwanted side > effect on the syntax highlighting. > > For example by removing the '_' from the 'iskeyword' setting, defined > syntax keywords start matching where

proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Hi, currently setting 'isk' option has - among others - an unwanted side effect on the syntax highlighting. For example by removing the '_' from the 'iskeyword' setting, defined syntax keywords start matching where they didn't match before. E.g. in a SQL buffer, CREATE TABLE FOOBAR(

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Hi Nikolay! On Di, 27 Okt 2015, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > Somewhere in the Neovim bug tracker I suggested that it would be > better to do another thing: Is there anything you haven't thought about it yet? > When syntax file is being loaded > save user setting then > at the each :syn statement

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

Christian Brabandt wrote: > That is true with many patches however. It works only well, if > contributors do use it. And a lot of syntax files need to be > maintained, if only because the language evolves within times. Best, > Christian Also because suggested syntax changes are occasionally

Re: proposed patch: Make syntax highlighting independent of 'iskeyword' setting

2015-10-27 20:00 GMT+03:00 Charles Campbell : > Christian Brabandt wrote: >> That is true with many patches however. It works only well, if >> contributors do use it. And a lot of syntax files need to be >> maintained, if only because the language evolves within times.