Hello Paul,
Paul pywp...@gmail.com a écrit:
I was puzzled by the second line break in the attached file. I want to
connect all lines that are next to each other (ie there is no blank
lines between them, the same way how tex defines a paragraph). So I
issue the following command:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to try it out to determine what you meant, but I reproduced the
problem in Windows 7 64-bit, running Vim 7.3.822.
Thank you, Sir. Here is the thing.
Sometimes i have to execute a number of substitutions over and
In gvim 7.3.882, gtk2-gnome gui, Kubuntu 12.10, I see the problem. (Also in
vim with uxterm.)
(They're more usually called combining characters, and your examples all have
what Unicode calls combining diacritical marks, f.ex.
̞
U+031E, COMBINING DOWN TACK BELOW
I mention this because I did
2013/3/6 tucky.k...@gmail.com
On Friday, January 18, 2013 10:09:19 PM UTC+1, David Halter wrote:
The IDE features are better than those of python-mode, but python-mode
offers other additional features. They work side by side. Just disable
the rope features of python-mode.
How do
Thank you Paul for your great suggestions. Even though I still don't quite
understand why my command fails at seemingly random places, it is not
important, and your command works beautifully for my purpose.
I know the second method you mentioned. But I prefer the first method because I
don't
Paul pywp...@gmail.com a écrit:
Thank you Paul for your great suggestions. Even though I still don't quite
understand why my command fails at seemingly random places,
Now I understand, and it's actually quite simple. The pattern
\([^\\n]\)\n\([^\\n]\)
means two characters separated by a
Hi William!
On Fr, 05 Apr 2013, William Fugh wrote:
It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
:%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
However, if like this:
:let @w = %s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
:@w
the combinations will be lost. :-(
It's a combining char ;)
BTW: Here is a patch.
regards,
Hi all,
hopefully, someone will be able to help me in the following issue.
I have recently installed the OutlookVim Vim plugin
(https://github.com/vim-scripts/OutlookVim, version 8.0). I have MS Windows 7
Enterprise SP1 (64-bit OS) and Vim 7.3.46
(ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/pc/gvim73_46.exe).
Given a buffer number, is it possible to find out (in Vimscript)
whether the corresponding buffer is hidden or not?
/lcd
--
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:48:37PM +0300, LCD 47 wrote:
Given a buffer number, is it possible to find out (in Vimscript)
whether the corresponding buffer is hidden or not?
you can change to said buffer with the buffer command
:buffer bufno
then you can test bufhidden for a null value
On Apr 6, 2:10 pm, zappathus...@free.fr wrote:
Now I understand, and it's actually quite simple.
The pattern
\([^\\n]\)\n\([^\\n]\)
...
and you ended up with
An
by y
because the n at the end of the first line was excluded
from the pattern.
Can be simplified to:
On Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:13:55 AM UTC+12, Christian Brabandt wrote:
BTW: Here is a patch.
Patch fixes it for me.
Regards, John
--
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
12 matches
Mail list logo
