пятница, 16 августа 2013 г., 18:35:47 UTC+4 пользователь Ben Fritz написал:
> On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:34:17 AM UTC-5, Alex K wrote:
>
> > четверг, 15 августа 2013 г., 22:26:58 UTC+4 пользователь MarcWeber написал:
>
> >
>
> > > Excerpts from Alex K's message of Thu Aug 15 20:22:05 +0200 20
1GvGy does not get the end of the last line. G just takes you to the
first non-blank character of a line.
I would use 1GvG$y
--
David Ohlemacher
Principle Software Engineer
Scientific Solutions Inc.
99 Perimeter Rd Nashua New Hampshire 03063
603-880-3784
. o .
. . o
o o o
--
--
You received
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:45:48 -0500
Benjamin Klein wrote:
> I have a silly question: What is the fastest way to yank all lines
> (V) in an opened file? I normally do:
>
> 1
> G
> V
> G
> yy
>
> Is that the simplest way to do this?
I use ggyG
But I know someone's going to find something better.
On 2013-08-17 01:03, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> Another solution in 4 keystrokes:
>
> ggyG
While this works, I tend to shirk it as I occasionally fly with
'nosol' set. It doesn't happen to impact it in this case, but the
extra thought exertion isn't worth it for me, so I just use the
:%y
that y
Benjamin Klein wrote:
> I have a silly question: What is the fastest way to yank all lines (V) in an
> opened file? I normally do:
>
> 1
> G
> V
> G
> yy
>
> Is that the simplest way to do this?
You have one y too much there. Instead of 1G it's quicker to type gg.
But you can also yank every
On 2013-08-16 17:45, Benjamin Klein wrote:
> I have a silly question: What is the fastest way to yank all lines
> (V) in an opened file? I normally do:
>
> 1
> G
> V
> G
> yy
>
> Is that the simplest way to do this?
If you insist on visual mode, I think you mean "1GVGy" not
"1GVGyy". A couple v
gg
v
shift-g
Gerald Klein DBA
contac...@geraldklein.com
www.geraldklein.com
geraldklein.wordpress.com
j...@zognet.com
708-599-0352
Arch/Gentoo Awesome, Ranger & Vim the coding triple threat.
Linux registered user #548580
From: Benjamin Klein
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 5:45 PM
To: vim_
I have a silly question: What is the fastest way to yank all lines (V) in an
opened file? I normally do:
1
G
V
G
yy
Is that the simplest way to do this?
--
b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Friday, August 16, 2013 11:56:03 AM UTC-5, Gautier DI FOLCO wrote:
>
>
> I have no difference with CTRL-K (it is alway ^M) but with CTRL-V I can see
> [0^M for , so, theoretically I can map , can't I?
Yes, in theory. I'm not exactly sure how to get any of those problematic ones
working in
On 2013-08-16 10:57, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2013-08-16, Javier Mediavilla Vegas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Is there any command or any method that allows to include a file
> > in the current file you are editing?
> >
> > By including a file I don't mean to read it with :read and paste
> > it. I mean
Hi Javier,
talk about your use case, not what you want.
Replacing \include looks to me you want text snippets such as
http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/topic/text-snippets-skeletons-templates.html
(this page is incomplete).
> Basically, I would like to have a conceal behaviour for such an order
>
On 2013-08-16, Javier Mediavilla Vegas wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there any command or any method that allows to include a file
> in the current file you are editing?
>
> By including a file I don't mean to read it with :read and paste
> it. I mean something like
> \include{file}
>
> The semantic
Hi all,
Is there any command or any method that allows to include a file in the current
file you are editing?
By including a file I don't mean to read it with :read and paste it. I mean
something like
\include{file}
The semantic that I am looking can be (merely an example):
In normal m
2013/8/16 Ben Fritz
> On Friday, August 16, 2013 9:55:56 AM UTC-5, Gautier DI FOLCO wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using ViM 7.3 on FreeBSD 9.1 and I have some troubles with mapping
> and :
> >
> > map A
> > map A
> >
> >
> > It doesn't work, have you the same issue or an idea of a solution?
>
On Friday, August 16, 2013 9:55:56 AM UTC-5, Gautier DI FOLCO wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using ViM 7.3 on FreeBSD 9.1 and I have some troubles with mapping
> and :
>
> map A
> map A
>
>
> It doesn't work, have you the same issue or an idea of a solution?
>
> For your help,
> Thanks by advanc
On Friday, August 16, 2013 7:00:15 AM UTC-7, David Fishburn wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jürgen Krämer wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> Reckoner wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I'm using vim 7.3 on windows 8.
>
> >
>
> > Is there a way to setup a normal mode mapping where if I hit on a
>
Hi all,
I'm using ViM 7.3 on FreeBSD 9.1 and I have some troubles with mapping
and :
map A
map A
It doesn't work, have you the same issue or an idea of a solution?
For your help,
Thanks by advance.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your rep
On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:34:17 AM UTC-5, Alex K wrote:
> четверг, 15 августа 2013 г., 22:26:58 UTC+4 пользователь MarcWeber написал:
>
> > Excerpts from Alex K's message of Thu Aug 15 20:22:05 +0200 2013:
>
> >
>
> > > Don't think it helps, because .c snipet is in default installation of
>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jürgen Krämer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Reckoner wrote:
> >
> > I'm using vim 7.3 on windows 8.
> >
> > Is there a way to setup a normal mode mapping where if I hit on
> a folded section, it will open that section (as in zO). The trick is that I
> only want that mapping
Hi,
Reckoner wrote:
>
> I'm using vim 7.3 on windows 8.
>
> Is there a way to setup a normal mode mapping where if I hit on a
> folded section, it will open that section (as in zO). The trick is that I
> only want that mapping to work *while on a folded line* and not otherwise
> map else
Hi,
I'm using vim 7.3 on windows 8.
Is there a way to setup a normal mode mapping where if I hit on a
folded section, it will open that section (as in zO). The trick is that I
only want that mapping to work *while on a folded line* and not otherwise
map elsewhere.
Possible?
Thanks!
--
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
