On Friday, July 11, 2014 3:24:45 PM UTC-5, Brett Stahlman wrote:
> On Friday, July 11, 2014 2:03:31 PM UTC-5, Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> > Hi Brett!
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Fr, 11 Jul 2014, Brett Stahlman wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > This is not what I see. Here's a test ca
Gary Johnson wrote:
> > > On one of the Linux machines on which I run Vim we run a backup
> > > program which creates hourly and nightly backups of each user's home
> > > directory in ~/.snapshot. The problem is that when I try to view
> > > the differences between a file and its backup copy usi
On Friday, July 11, 2014 2:03:31 PM UTC-5, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Brett!
>
>
>
> On Fr, 11 Jul 2014, Brett Stahlman wrote:
>
>
>
> > This is not what I see. Here's a test case consisting of the
>
> > map-operator example from the Vim help, along with a normal mode
>
> > remapping of
Ah. Of course! Makes perfect sense now.
Thanks,
Brett S.
On Jul 11, 2014 2:03 PM, "Christian Brabandt" wrote:
> Hi Brett!
>
> On Fr, 11 Jul 2014, Brett Stahlman wrote:
>
> > This is not what I see. Here's a test case consisting of the
> > map-operator example from the Vim help, along with a norma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On July 11, 2014 10:54:36 PM GMT+03:00, Brett Stahlman
wrote:
>On Friday, July 11, 2014 12:51:47 PM UTC-5, ZyX wrote:
>> > Having thought about it a bit, it occurs to me that it would be
>very difficult for Vim's g@ implementation to treat movement
Hi Brett!
On Fr, 11 Jul 2014, Brett Stahlman wrote:
> This is not what I see. Here's a test case consisting of the
> map-operator example from the Vim help, along with a normal mode
> remapping of $ to G. Hitting $ in normal mode now goes to the end of
> the file, but hitting $ counts only the sp
On Friday, July 11, 2014 12:51:47 PM UTC-5, ZyX wrote:
> > Having thought about it a bit, it occurs to me that it would be very
> > difficult for Vim's g@ implementation to treat movements accomplished via
> > user mappings the same as built-in {motion}s. Perhaps that's why only Vim
> > {motion}
> Having thought about it a bit, it occurs to me that it would be very
> difficult for Vim's g@ implementation to treat movements accomplished via
> user mappings the same as built-in {motion}s. Perhaps that's why only Vim
> {motion}s are considered? In the case of Paredit, Tamas has graciously
On Friday, July 11, 2014 7:18:39 AM UTC-5, Brett Stahlman wrote:
> Hello,
> I recently noticed that Paredit's `d{motion}' map doesn't behave the way
> I would expect: in particular, although `)' in normal mode jumps
> correctly to the end of the current S-expression, `d)' deletes beyond
> the end o
On 2014-07-11, Павлов Николай Александрович wrote:
> On July 11, 2014 11:38:15 AM GMT+03:00, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >On 10.07.14 16:54, Gary Johnson wrote:
> >> On the other hand, a file system such as we're using for backups
> >> seems pretty unusual, and equal inode numbers over network file
Hello,
I recently noticed that Paredit's `d{motion}' map doesn't behave the way
I would expect: in particular, although `)' in normal mode jumps
correctly to the end of the current S-expression, `d)' deletes beyond
the end of the S-exp. It seems as though perhaps the `)' motion reverts
to its non-P
Am 2014-07-11 01:54, schrieb Gary Johnson:
On the other hand, a file system such as we're using for backups
seems pretty unusual, and equal inode numbers over network file
systems is also pretty rare. Is this problem worth fixing? Would a
patch even be considered? Or should I just resort to wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On July 11, 2014 11:38:15 AM GMT+03:00, Erik Christiansen
wrote:
>On 10.07.14 16:54, Gary Johnson wrote:
>> On the other hand, a file system such as we're using for backups
>> seems pretty unusual, and equal inode numbers over network file
>> syste
On 10.07.14 16:54, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On the other hand, a file system such as we're using for backups
> seems pretty unusual, and equal inode numbers over network file
> systems is also pretty rare. Is this problem worth fixing? Would a
> patch even be considered? Or should I just resort to
14 matches
Mail list logo
