It is 2 lines, and the ^M is indeed a ctrl-M, that can be typed as you did, or
by ctrl-q. Depending on your vim options you may also be able to use
or \n to get the same effect.
\r not \n, especially in this case (the replacement in a :s command).
Using \n would put a null byte in your file, no
IOW the last line in the file will never get folded with this
range. I'm not sure how to correct it.
quite easy to fix that: never mind my use of %$ in the or statement, just use
a substitute command to add a line with, Topic: to the end of the file. Fixed!
alternately, any any blank or nonse
On 19/04/11 03:34, Leslie Viljoen wrote:
g/^Topic: */,/^Topic: *\|\%$/-1fold
If you put these two commands in a script, they will be executed, when you
source the script, so you need not prepend a colon or hit return for each
command. Again, you may be interested only in the second c
On 19/04/11 03:04, howard Schwartz wrote:
Leslie wrote:
I don't know what to make of this. For one thing I can't type it
without "trailing characters" errors. Is it all one line? Is it an ex
command? I tried inserting the ^M's with ctrl-q-ctrl-m but it
immediately terminated the command.
It i
> g/^Topic: */,/^Topic: *\|\%$/-1fold
>
> If you put these two commands in a script, they will be executed, when you
> source the script, so you need not prepend a colon or hit return for each
> command. Again, you may be interested only in the second command.
>
> Clear I hope?
Yes, than
Leslie wrote:
I don't know what to make of this. For one thing I can't type it
without "trailing characters" errors. Is it all one line? Is it an ex
command? I tried inserting the ^M's with ctrl-q-ctrl-m but it
immediately terminated the command.
It is 2 lines, and the ^M is indeed a ctrl-M, t
On Apr 18, 1:18 pm, Ben Fritz wrote:
> Leslie Viljoen wrote:
> > I think the problem would be solved if Vim could recognise a new
> > section starting and use that to terminate the previous one. Looking
> > at Python syntax files, it looks like people are using huge vimscripts
> > to solve a sim
On Apr 17, 6:44 pm, howard Schwartz wrote:
> Im not sure if this idea might help, but I faced a similar problem in folding
> blocks of text within email digests like that for vim_use. And I did not have
> the stomach for fancy, script-based folding strategies. So I discovered
> something simple.
Leslie Viljoen wrote:
> I think the problem would be solved if Vim could recognise a new
> section starting and use that to terminate the previous one. Looking
> at Python syntax files, it looks like people are using huge vimscripts
> to solve a similar problem - which is a bit of a hack I think
Im not sure if this idea might help, but I faced a similar problem in folding
blocks of text within email digests like that for vim_use. And I did not have
the stomach for fancy, script-based folding strategies. So I discovered
something simple. Here is a fold for blocks of text that appear with
Hi everyone
I have been trying to create a syntax file for Inform7 that will
include code folding. Unfortunately Vim does not seem to like the fact
that Inform7 does not have explicit endings to regions - a section is
ended by a new section starting.
Inform7 has sections like this:
Section 1
He
11 matches
Mail list logo
