Hello, everyone
Under some complex syntax, the speed of vim will become somehow a
little slow. The screen and text will blink when we do the editing
and moving. So can we let vim use double buffer to avoid this
problem?
Regards,
Yichao Zhou.
--
You received this message from the vim_use
On 04/11/12 10:13, Yichao Zhou wrote:
Under some complex syntax, the speed of vim will become
somehow a little slow. The screen and text will blink when we
do the editing and moving. So can we let vim use double
buffer to avoid this problem?
It sounds like you might want to look
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:36:41AM +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
I map m-1 m-2 to tab 1,2 etc. This way I have O(1) access to 3 files or
more I'm currently focusing on.
m-X key jump to tab X
for i in range(1,8)
exec 'map m-'.i.' '.i.'gt'
endfor
I have similar bindings.
However :b also works
not to save current buffer, and still use multiple
buffers(files)?
I map m-1 m-2 to tab 1,2 etc. This way I have O(1) access to 3 files or
more I'm currently focusing on.
m-X key jump to tab X
for i in range(1,8)
exec 'map m-'.i.' '.i.'gt'
endfor
They may be helpful to you as well.
Marc Weber
Hello,
(I'm not sure if this is a valid question, but let me ask)
I'm using vim to edit several source files using buffer switch like:
:b [tab]
But it requires saving the current buffer, and I don't want to save.
Is there any way not to save current buffer, and still use multiple
buffers(files
On 08/18/2010 06:47 PM, Yoshi wrote:
Hello,
(I'm not sure if this is a valid question, but let me ask)
I'm using vim to edit several source files using buffer switch like:
:b [tab]
But it requires saving the current buffer, and I don't want to save.
Is there any way not to save current buffer
don't want to save.
Is there any way not to save current buffer, and still use multiple
buffers(files)?
Thank you
I believe that's :set hidden. Then you can switch buffers without
saving. -ak
Thank you, I appreciate.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post
