On Sep 21, 11:31 pm, Benjamin R. Haskell v...@benizi.com wrote:
I can't quite figure out a way to use = with 't'. But, perhaps the next
best thing (depending on your use-case) is the '*' search. If you
navigate to put the cursor above the = through other means
(word/sentence/paragraph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:08:27PM +1000, Ramana Kumar wrote:
Wow I never know what q: was for. Looks cool! My iabbrevs even
work in there.
If you already typed something in command mode (: ..), pressing
C-F also opens this window.
Regards,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:45:48PM +1000, Ramana Kumar wrote:
Digraphs look like an awesome solution; I just need to add a few more
maps to the digraph table.
:h digraphs
Adding digraphs is simple, you can however only create digraphs
consisting of two trigger characters.
Simon
--
+ privacy
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, BC wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:31 pm, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
I can't quite figure out a way to use = with 't'. But, perhaps the
next best thing (depending on your use-case) is the '*' search. If
you navigate to put the cursor above the = through other means
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Simon Ruderich si...@ruderich.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:45:48PM +1000, Ramana Kumar wrote:
Digraphs look like an awesome solution; I just need to add a few more
maps to the digraph table.
:h digraphs
Adding digraphs is simple, you can however
Ответ на сообщение «Re: to or till (f or t) a non-ascii character»,
присланное в 01:17:57 23 сентября 2010, Четверг,
отправитель Ramana Kumar:
You can use redir:
redir! digraphs
silent dig
redir END
view digraphs
Use normal search here
Текст сообщения:
On Thu, Sep 23
On Sep 22, 2:17 pm, Ramana Kumar ramana.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Simon Ruderich si...@ruderich.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:45:48PM +1000, Ramana Kumar wrote:
Digraphs look like an awesome solution; I just need to add a few more
maps to the digraph
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bee 200...@calcentral.com wrote:
Is this the digraph you are looking for, like a lazy L (ell)
NO ¬ 172
No I want an epsilon with a line through it: ∉
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, ZyX zyx@gmail.com wrote:
Ответ на сообщение Re: to or till (f or t) a non-ascii character,
присланное в 01:17:57 23 сентября 2010, Четверг,
отправитель Ramana Kumar:
You can use redir:
redir! digraphs
silent dig
redir END
view digraphs
On Sep 22, 2:57 pm, Ramana Kumar ramana.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bee 200...@calcentral.com wrote:
Is this the digraph you are looking for, like a lazy L (ell)
NO ¬ 172
No I want an epsilon with a line through it: ∉
Ah like this?
:dig E/ 8713
--
You
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bee 200...@calcentral.com wrote:
No I want an epsilon with a line through it: ∉
Ah like this?
:dig E/ 8713
Oh I know I can set it up myself :)
I just wondered if there was a built-in digraph for this character,
since all the other ones I want are already
On Sep 22, 4:21 pm, Ramana Kumar ramana.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bee 200...@calcentral.com wrote:
No I want an epsilon with a line through it: ∉
Ah like this?
:dig E/ 8713
Oh I know I can set it up myself :)
I just wondered if there was a built-in digraph
I have set up some abbreviations to turn certain ASCII strings into
appropriate Unicode counterparts, for example from '==' to '='. This works
wonderfully.
One problem, however, is when I now have a Unicode character sitting in my
buffer, I can't jump to it easily using the insert-mode 't' and
A related but different issue is getting those characters into the command
line buffer, for example if I want to search for a a string containing
Unicode characters. My abbreviations won't work in that buffer... is there a
way to get them to work? Or what about yanking/putting text between the
Annoyingly, I see that Google Groups changed the '=' I had pasted in
(from Vim) to =.
Strange, because it appeared correctly in the text box.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Sep 21, 8:21 pm, BC bruce.armstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Annoyingly, I see that Google Groups changed the '=' I had pasted in
(from Vim) to =.
Strange, because it appeared correctly in the text box.
Ok, I give up. I don't know why the OP's unicode characters are
showing up, but not mine.
I haven't seen any Unicode characters from you BC, but if you're using
google's text box to send these messages that could be the issue. My
original message was sent with gmail web interface, which might (don't
know for sure) be more accepting than googlegroups web interface.
I got the characters
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Ramana Kumar wrote:
I have set up some abbreviations to turn certain ASCII strings into
appropriate Unicode counterparts, for example from '==' to '='. This
works wonderfully.
From equals, equals, greater-than, to equals, greater-than? Must be
something about the web
From equals, equals, greater-than, to equals, greater-than? Must be
something about the web interface.
Oh don't worry, all your supposedly Unicode characters also came out
in ASCII here.
Personally, I find external-to-Vim methods for entering Unicode characters
to be much better. For
19 matches
Mail list logo
