Re: TCP/IP Problems

--- the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 22:09 -0500 on 03/04/02, rlf9 wrote: > > >Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs > like IPNetMonitor et al > >by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's > original purpose was... > > Keeps PPP from connecting constantly... > > the pickl

Re: OT and/or TCP/IP Problems

On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 04:33 AM, Visionary wrote: > So, how does one get at this? Go to Edit->User Mode (Cmd-U) and select the advanced option. The TCP/IP dialog changes a bit, adding a few new options, one of these is and info dialog that tells you the hardware address of the machine,

Re: TCP/IP Problems

On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 04:09 AM, rlf9 wrote: > Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs like IPNetMonitor et al > by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's original purpose was... One other purpose was to save memory on older machines, the IP Stack takes up a lot of room and

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart) wrote: >I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.1 >with great pleasure, but if somebody sends me a picture as attachment, >Eudora eats it and spits it out as below: > >--7372ECABF546797AEF2CFB90 >Content-Type: im

Re: TCP/IP Problems

At 1:04 AM -0500 4/4/02, the pickle wrote: >At 22:09 -0500 on 03/04/02, rlf9 wrote: > >>Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs like IPNetMonitor et al >>by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's original purpose was... > >Keeps PPP from connecting constantly... It also saves on memo

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Jeff wrote: >> I took another look at the Eudora config menu. The choice 'application TEXT >> files belong to' is pointed to my word processor Writenow 4. Is that OK - >> in the context of this question? >> >> -mart > > >No, because it's only going to translate picture attachments as text. Not OK

Re: TCP/IP Problems

On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, rlf9 wrote: > by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's original purpose was... Save memory. The IP stack isn't small (taking into account the amount of RAM machine shad in those days). Andrew -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and... Small Dog

Re: TCP/IP Problems

>From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: TCP/IP Problems >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >--- the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 22:09 -0500 on 03/04/02, rlf9 wrote: >> >> >Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs >> like IPNetMonitor et al >> >by sustworks.com

Re: TCP/IP Problems

>From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 04:09 AM, rlf9 wrote: > >> Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs like IPNetMonitor et al >> by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's original

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Here's a trick I did on an attachment you sent me (yes it chews up outgoing ones too). I highlighted the data portion, copied and pasted it into a BBEdit file and saved it with the extension .bin. I then threw it onto Stuffit Expander, worked fine. I think it was BinHex or Macbinary but it mig

Re: TCP/IP Problems

At 10:09 PM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Also, "Load only when needed" screws up programs like IPNetMonitor et al >by sustworks.com. I wonder what the option's original purpose was... > >Bob F The original intent was to save memory. When OT was introduced, it wasn't unusual for Macs to have 8-16

What's in a PRAM...

Someone wanted to know what was held in the PRAM ona 68k Mac, here is Apple's list of items held in PRAM on 68k machines taken from KBase article #2238: Contents of PRAM Status of AppleTalk Serial Port Configuration and Port definition Alarm clock setting Application font Serial printer locatio

Re: pram and 7.5.3 upgrade

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: Re: pram and 7.5.3 upgrade >From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 01:40 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote: >>> ...they added more to it >>> when they made the >>> PowerMac

monitor question

I'm buying a IIci with a Radius video card. I've been told this machine used to run a 19" monitor. I'm looking at a 17" apple monitor that is a multiscan. It's my understanding, from what I've read, that I should be able to use this monitor. Am I way off? Should I be looking at a 14" RGB appl

Re: monitor question

At 19:11 -0800 on 04/04/02, Teri Pittman wrote: >I'm buying a IIci with a Radius video card. I've been told this machine >used to run a 19" monitor. I'm looking at a 17" apple monitor that is a >multiscan. It's my understanding, from what I've read, that I should be >able to use this monitor.

7.6 onto my IIci ?

About 3 weeks ago i found a IIci, it has 7.0.1 on it but would like to up it to 7.6 the only internet connection is on a PC, but i would like to change that. The info i have found on the web has me more lost then when i started. I could use some help. Thanks, Jeff -- Vintage Macs is sponsored

Re: 7.6 onto my IIci ?

At 22:46 -0500 on 04/04/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >About 3 weeks ago i found a IIci, it has 7.0.1 on it but would like to up it >to 7.6 the only internet connection is on a PC, but i would like to change >that. You need to buy 7.6. the pickle FAQ Software Arc

Re: Tweety

Vintage Macs wrote... >Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 22:40:22 -0700 >From: "James A. Reible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Virtual Girl > >The EMF Profiler is another good one. >Tweety=81 also. >:-) What's Tweety=81? Do you mean something other than the Tweety 1.0 extension from '92? Bob F --

What's CUDA? Re: pram and 7.5.3 upgrade

--- rlf9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...which reminds me to say that my two Performa > 475's (auto-inject) both have CUDA buttons. OK, what does CUDA stand for? I'm rather certain it has nothing to do with something like a 1969 Chrysler Hemi Cuda with a 426ci engine and the three, 2 barrel car

Re: What's in a PRAM...

At 5:15 PM -0700 4/4/02, Mark Benson wrote: >Someone wanted to know what was held in the PRAM ona 68k Mac, here is >Apple's list of items held in PRAM on 68k machines taken from KBase >article #2238: > It's been years since I had an ocassion to zap PRAM on any of my Macs and that was on my origi