--- Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On some platforms you'd run a degrader of some
sort.
Doesn't one exist for the mac?
There is one I'm pretty sure, but I can't for the
life of me remember what it's called.
VMac for Mac. :) Emulates a Mac Plus.
http://www.vmac.org May still run too fast
Gregg Eshelman wrote:
--- Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On some platforms you'd run a degrader of some sort.
Doesn't one exist for the mac?
There is one I'm pretty sure, but I can't for the
life of me remember what it's called.
VMac for Mac. :) Emulates a Mac Plus.
While we're cheating, here's another emulator that you could try. Never tried
it myself, but remembered seeing it come across the daily updates. Granted,
this won't bring true nostalgia, but it's worth a shot if you run into dead
ends doing the real way.
Peace,
Todd
--
Vintage Macs is
First, thanks for all of the help so far. I especially hadn't thought of the monitor
compatibility, I'll have to ponder that.
Second, since someone brought up emulation, what has the groups experience been with
this subject. I know that several exist (Basilisk, Executor, SoftMac, VMac, etc)
Second, since someone brought up emulation, what has the groups
experience been with this subject. I know that several exist
(Basilisk, Executor, SoftMac, VMac, etc) and I have read some
reviews, but...I would still like to know what this group thinks.
I mentioned before that the reason I got
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:46:52 -0500
From: Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new 68k for Dad
If you need a third choice, I would actually suggest an LC (not an LC
II or III), even though LowEndMac declared it a Road Apple. Though it
is essentially a repackaging of the Mac II (it
.
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.What's up with that? It's not even a power of 2.
Apple must have done something seriously stupid in the ROM and/or the
memory map, because that's not the kind of number you're likely to
get from a
At 03:50 +1000 on 25/03/03, Adam wrote:
.
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.What's up with that? It's not even a power of 2.
Apple must have done something seriously stupid in the ROM and/or the
memory map, because that's not the kind of
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.
snip
The 10Mb RAM limit was deliberately programmed into the LC's ASICs.
Which says to me patch it!
There *has* to be a way to patch that ROM in software to get around the
limitation.
That would rock,
At 04:05 +1000 on 25/03/03, Adam wrote:
That would rock, but, is the limitation actually programmed into the ROM? Or
is it built into the memory controller or some other inaccessable location?
No one really knows for sure, but I suspect the ROM.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
10 matches
Mail list logo
