I have been looking on intel site for the particular p4 that apple would
be using, but searching even for just the word apple yields little. I
was curious to know which particular pentium4 apple uses or will use. I
have built several pentium 4 systems, one with dual processors, so spent
a
--- NODEraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because Intel will be manufacturing the chips
doesn't mean that
future Macs will be running Pentium 4's. If Apple
gives them specs for a PPC, they'll make it.
They won't be running PPC. The devlopment systems
Apple is shipping out soon have P4's
Hi,
Here is an interesting piece a friend forwarded to me. Very scary...
-- Forwarded Message
From: Ernst du Toit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:41:47 +1200
To: Andre Skarzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best said reference yet
History repeats again:
On 6/9/05, Andre Skarzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting piece a friend forwarded to me. Very scary...
Facinating! That's a parallel I just drew in a discussion on CIX...
--
Liam Proven
Home: http://welcome.to/liamsweb * Blog: http://lproven.livejournal.com
AOL, Yahoo
--- Andre Skarzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting piece a friend forwarded to
me. Very scary...
There's a STRONG argument for managing the
Apple/IBM/Motorola alliance.
If the problem is IBM's financial shuffling, then what
kind of money does
--- Liam Proven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Andre Skarzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting piece a friend forwarded to
me. Very scary...
Facinating! That's a parallel I just drew in a
discussion on CIX...
Interesting. But short of something drastically
Just because Intel will be manufacturing the chips doesn't mean that
future Macs will be running Pentium 4's. If Apple gives them specs for
a PPC, they'll make it.
On 6/9/05, Gregg Eshelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Liam Proven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Andre Skarzynski [EMAIL
