At 20:21 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
Too bad MacWeb was abandoned. It wasn't a bad little browser and it got
There's a project, though I haven't a clue of its progress, to get the MacWWW
code updated for modern browsing and written in 68K assembly for best
performance.
Marten was
At 17:10:44 -0600 on 23 Mar, Steve Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its Mystery Motherboard Time!...ID: 820-0380-A Apple Computer
At 5:31 PM on 3/23/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not much of a mystery when the only hit on Google
for that part number tells you what it is.
At 19:02:52
Its Mystery Motherboard Time!
(Also sent to the Quad list just in case)
OK, was going through my Mac stuff and I came across this MB I want to ID.
It has what I believe to be a 68040 CPU (as I said, its a guess here as the
chip has some thingie on top of it thats kinda like a square of prongs
At 17:10 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
The board just says this for an ID: 820-0380-A Apple Computer, Inc. C. 1992
Not much of a mystery when the only hit on Google for that part number tells
you what it is.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
on 3/23/03 5:31 PM, the pickle at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The board just says this for an ID: 820-0380-A Apple Computer, Inc. C. 1992
Not much of a mystery when the only hit on Google for that part number tells
you what it is.
Just a hint Pickle: It would make you seem like less of a jerk
on 3/23/03 5:31 PM, the pickle at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The board just says this for an ID: 820-0380-A Apple Computer, Inc. C.
1992
Not much of a mystery when the only hit on Google for that part number tells
you what it is.
Just a hint Pickle: It would make you seem like less of a jerk
At 19:02 -0600 on 23/03/03, Jamie Hutt wrote:
If you can't be of any assistance to the poor soul looking for help, just
don't answer.
Hey, Jabba, the info I gave was correct and useful.
Your post wasn't.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
At 19:50 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
bit not seeing anything that looked familiar. Now, I am on a IIci using NS
4.05 and as Google uses JavaScript its a pain on my machine (yes, I plan to
Might want to update to NS 4.08 too.
PSIs Opera out for 68K Macs yet (it was promised) and
At 19:50 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
bit not seeing anything that looked familiar. Now, I am on a IIci using NS
4.05 and as Google uses JavaScript its a pain on my machine (yes, I plan to
Might want to update to NS 4.08 too.
Tried that route. Crashed the machine something fierce (and
At 20:21 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
Too bad MacWeb was abandoned. It wasn't a bad little browser and it got
There's a project, though I haven't a clue of its progress, to get the MacWWW
code updated for modern browsing and written in 68K assembly for best
performance.
Marten was
At 20:21 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
Too bad MacWeb was abandoned. It wasn't a bad little browser and it got
There's a project, though I haven't a clue of its progress, to get the MacWWW
code updated for modern browsing and written in 68K assembly for best
performance.
Marten was
At 20:44 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
kinda slow on the IIci (32M RAm, 7.5.5, and yes I have the Cache card). Did
you at least like Cyberdog?
It was fine five years ago.
It's now virtually useless.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
Now all we need is the revival of MacLynx (one doesn't need graphics to
read a text based site).
Steve
Steve Conrad
810 Main
Henrietta, MO 64036
816-494-5692 http://sasha91.0pi.com
www.fortunecity.com/rivendell/stonekeep/600
It is no secret (nor should it
At 21:11 -0600 on 23/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
Now all we need is the revival of MacLynx (one doesn't need graphics to
read a text based site).
WannaBe is a good alternative that actually works *most* of the time.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
14 matches
Mail list logo
