Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c > which is separated from the function definition and is hard > to catch up the kernel update. > To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at > bu

Re: Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2013/11/11 20:16), Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c >> which is separated from the function definition and is hard >> to catch up the kernel update. >> To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new >> NOKPROBE_S

Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. > > OK, I'll do. :) > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me > to pos

Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. > > > > OK, I'll do. :) > > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which > > kprobes ported. In that case,