Re: udev PATH_ID for virtio devices

2015-09-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
sirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>> >> 1) if there is a guarantee now and in the future (even if only >>> >> restricted to netdevs) that no virtio bus will have a direct sibling >&g

Re: udev PATH_ID for virtio devices

2015-09-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin

Re: udev PATH_ID for virtio devices

2015-08-24 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:24:10PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu

Re: udev PATH_ID for virtio devices

2014-03-27 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 27,