Hello Ivan,
Thank you for that deep analysis and presentation of Virtuoso internals :)
It was very useful for me and I look forward to more of such
explorations with you and other developers.
Regards
Rajeev J Sebastian
On Jan 23, 2008 10:23 PM, Ivan Mikhailov wrote:
> Rajeev,
>
> > What actual
Rajeev,
> What actually should have worked was "1"^^xsd:int ... since that was
> the value in my sample data.
I see. I'll check one more time.
> Also, in Virtuoso, will there be equivalence between typed values ?
> For e.g., in python, 1 == 1.0 works even thought first is integer and
> second is
Hello Ivan,
On Jan 23, 2008 2:30 PM, Ivan Mikhailov wrote:
> Rajeev,
>
> As far as I understand, you've intended to find out subject with
> property equal to an integer 1.
Yes that was what I was trying.
> But "1" and 1 are two different things,
> 1^^xsd:int is also differs in type and { ?x urn
Rajeev,
As far as I understand, you've intended to find out subject with
property equal to an integer 1. But "1" and 1 are two different things,
1^^xsd:int is also differs in type and { ?x urn:prop1 1. } contains a
subtle error -- dot immediately after "1" become decimal point of double
precision
