Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem with bif:contains inside optional

2016-02-17 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140 ___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mail

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Problem with bif:contains inside optional

2016-02-13 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users -- Lorenz Bühmann AKSW group, University of Leipzig Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center ---

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Library to parse SPARQL queries

2015-06-25 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
people to our Restful service, they just test the queries with SPARQL endpoint of Virtuoso, then they expected it would work with our Restful service. Does anyone of you know any possible solution for our issue. Thanks! Best regards, Kinh On 25/06/15 16:03, Lorenz Bühmann wrote: Apache

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Library to parse SPARQL queries

2015-06-25 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users -- Lorenz Bühmann AKSW group, University of Leipzig Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Sub-optimal query planning: regex faster than bif:contains

2014-08-19 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users -- Lorenz Bühmann, MSc in Computer Science AKSW group, University of Leipzig Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

Re: [Virtuoso-users] DBpedia SERVICE queries acting unexpectedly

2014-07-31 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
The labels are contained in the DBpedia ontology. Lorenz On 07/31/2014 12:27 PM, Jaana Takis wrote: Hi Hugh, this does not work unfortunately, I get the exact same issue running your query on my local Virtuoso sparql endpoint: p label http://purl.org/dc/terms/subjectSubject@en

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Optional clause location in SPAQRL

2014-06-26 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
Hi Rumi, I'm just wondering about your answer. Is this a bug in Virtuoso or not? I would assume that an OPTIONAL should not influence the number of the resultset, so why does the second query returns a different number? Kind reagrds, Lorenz On 06/26/2014 02:45 PM, Rumi wrote: Hi Olga, On

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Get most specific type of a resource fails sometimes

2014-02-06 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
%3E%20a?moreSpecificType%20.?moreSpecificType%20%3Chttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf+ ?type.}} Thank you for the help, Lorenz Bühmann On 02/06/2014 02:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 2/6/14 7:57 AM, Lorenz Bühmann wrote: Hi, I just wanted to report some unexpected behaviour when

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Get most specific type of a resource fails sometimes

2014-02-06 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FJohn_the_Baptist%3E+a+%0D%0A%3FmoreSpecificType+.%0D%0A%3FmoreSpecificType+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2F01%2Frdf-schema%23subClassOf%3E%2B+%3Ftype.%7D%0D%0A%7Dformat=text%2Fhtmltimeout=30debug=on Thanks again, Lorenz Bühmann On 02/06/2014 02:22 PM, Kingsley

Re: [Virtuoso-users] compare literals via SPARQL on DBpedia

2013-11-22 Thread Lorenz Bühmann
wrote: On 11/22/13 2:55 PM, Lorenz Bühmann wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if it's a bug when I try to run the following SPARQL query on http://dbpedia.org/sparql SELECT * WHERE { ?s dbpedia-owl:birthDate ?o1. ?s dbpedia-owl:birthDate ?o2. FILTER(!sameTerm(?o1, ?o2)) } LIMIT 100 which