I see three new emails here on . I intend a reply to each; but
Alia is going to get short-changed until perhaps tomorrow. :^(
Alia Atlas wrote:
>
>...
> I would like to add some nuance to the description of IETF Hubs and
> distinguish between the activity of being an IETF Remote Hub for one o
I understand it is too late to do anything about Chicago, but I suggest
that the IETF remove the US as a candidate for any future meetings.
Wanting to do something,
Paul
On 1/29/17 11:28 PM, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote:
For obvious reasons, there is some renewed/incr
Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 1/29/17 8:21 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
>...
>> 1) A physical location for the meeting...
>> 2) Limited attendance and interest...
>> 3) Split Community...
>> 4) Inconvenience of time-zone...
>
> I concur with all of the above. I don't see how these are likely to be
> overco
nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote:
>
> I believe that we should have a short term and long term goal.
>
> Short term, since Chicago is literally upon us, I would say, let the
> remote hub meet in any way that it can.
Just to emphasize: Remote-hubs that can't offer 8 conference rooms sho
Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> I suggest that the IETF remove the US as a candidate for any future meetings.
That isn't a topic for
--
John Leslie
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www
John,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, John Leslie wrote:
>I see three new emails here on . I intend a reply to each; but
> Alia is going to get short-changed until perhaps tomorrow. :^(
>
> Alia Atlas wrote:
> >
> >...
> > I would like to add some nuance to the description of IETF Hubs an
On 1/30/17 11:26 AM, John Leslie wrote:
Paul Kyzivat wrote:
On 1/29/17 8:21 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
...
1) A physical location for the meeting...
2) Limited attendance and interest...
3) Split Community...
4) Inconvenience of time-zone...
I concur with all of the above. I don't see how these a
Hello All,
I wanted to reach out to the community in Africa, especially those who may be
in the countries affected by the visa ban to the United States: Somalia, Sudan
and Libya.
There are quite a few people in the IETF community who are concerned about your
ability to participate in the IETF9
--On Monday, January 30, 2017 11:55 -0500 Alia Atlas
wrote:
>...
> Yes - I am pushing back against Dave Crocker's question about
> what each Remote
> Hub needs to have to fully participate.
>
> In reality, I think one or more conference rooms are good. I
> don't quite think that a place
> for
