In a message dated 2010.06.18 04:16 -0500, Corne Beerse wrote:
> For what its worth, I'd never trust application-based encryption. If I
> need encryption, I use a tunnel like VPN or SSH as they are build for
> that purpose. Then run the vnc-communication trough that tunnel.
CBee, after years of
Nicholson, Rob wrote:
Don't forget, it's DOUBLE COLON between the IP address and the port. Well it is
on RealVNC.
[...]
PS. I really, really, really wish that reply went to the group.
Me, too. This is my only list that does not work that way.
--
John
On 2006.05.01 18:23 MontrealPaul wrote:
regarding the "netiquette" of having newer material down below: While it may
seem logical, from a top-to-bottom-left-to-right (in our culture)...
"our culture" in this sense: English, like all languages descended from Latin,
is written from top to bot
At 050405 09:03 -0700, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two locations having following IP address:
Server: 202.131.119.182, 255.255.255.248
Client: 202.197.42.102, 255.255.255.230
Are you *sure about that second mask? I could believe 240 - but 230?
--
John
At 050303 12:53 -0500, Zach Dennis wrote:
Alex Pankratov wrote:
Jerry,
We are NOT paying lots of money as we do NOT relay your
traffic. It is p2p system, the bandwidth usage for us is
under few megs a day. Can you fit this together under one hat ?
Alex,
No need for the tone of your last sentence. I
At 14:39 + 041117, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think someone on this list might have a virus. I keep getting
non-delivery reports (see below) ...
==
- Forwarded by Ben Blackmore/GB/TISUB on 17/11/2004 14:29 -
|-+
In the course of an old familiar topic [Finding a Remote IP], another
old familiar topic [re Reply-To:] arose, and David Balazic wrote at
10:49 +0200 040825:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Kenton White[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2004 1
Revisiting an old plea to the listmom: Could we go back to the old
(and normal) mailing list practice of Reply-To: ? Since the
new regime, I've lost track of how many times people have had to be
reminded to post replies to the list, as in this case:
At 20:00 -0500 031027, William Hooper wrote
At 030203 12:23 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it was because we had 1 user, who set his auto reply out of
office. So a message went to him, his out of office replied to the
list, which was then sent to him, which the out of office replied to
again, it went around and around for a who
At 12:05 -0500 030204, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
> Wez felt that dropping the "Reply-To:" header would stop those
conspiracies of dumb mail clients and dumb majordomo - and it has at
least done that. Other lists are able to use "Reply-To:" to maintain
threading without having to yield to dum
At 20:12 +1100 030203, arkenstone wrote:
I'll have to agree with all of this, specifically what John Kaufmann said.
It's quite often more difficult to follow a thread on this list, due to the
whole reply-to header.
As i only joined the list in the last month or so, would anyone
At 030202 19:21 -0500, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
Please note that I've copied the lists.
Thanks, Fred. Actually, I anticipated that I *should* have replied
to you *on*list (because this really is still an issue of list
concern), and so posted again to the list - after you replied to the
same
At 030202 13:50 -0500, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
Hello,
I'm finding that I sometimes receive
email on a thread that is also posted
to a mailing list or newsgroup. It could
be a thread I started, or joined afterward.
The problem is that there is no information
on the headers that the email is al
At 021209 19:49 -0800, Dustin Johnson wrote:
What's your deal, McBride? Either you don't really know what you are talking
about and are simply falling into the group of bashing windowz to hide your
insecurities or you are just mean.
Dustin, why in the world would you jump into a thread - after
At 021029 19:24 +, Andy Harter wrote:
At 021028 12:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We need to set our machines up so that they time out after about five
minutes, if a user forgets to log off. I am using the following registry
key:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\software\ORL\WinVNC3\IdleTimeout
At 020711 13:13 +0600, Md. Sifat Ullah Patwary wrote:
>Dear List,
>
>It seems to me that there where some queries about VNC Server with Multiple
>monitor display to work with a single vnc viewer. But how can I obtain the
>reverse requirements?
>I want to view only some portion of my vncserver dis
At 020530 09:56 -0500, Mike Miller wrote:
>I don't understand what caused the sudden spate of unsubscribes. Was it a
>change in the web and e-mail addresses for the list?
It's just a transitional glitch coming from the change in list admin
from one server to another. [We had not been seeing
At 020529 13:21 +0100, James ''Wez'' Weatherall wrote:
>Guys,
>
> Sorry about the attachment-noise on the list. I'm working on it.
>
> Cheers,
Thanks, James. Some transfer/startup glitches are to be expected,
but it's nice to know you're on the case. While you're at it, could
you al
18 matches
Mail list logo
