Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-12 Thread Michael Rosen
Thanks. I found Superscan to be a great utility as well. Mike On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:54:35 + (GMT), Scott C. Best <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike: > >Heya. Sorry for the late reply, but I thought I'd > suggest something relatively simple: when you're testing out > your router's

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-07 Thread Michael Rosen
Whoa... I just tried telnetting from work to #2 and it worked! I left it at port 6900. I don't know if that did the trick or if some other random act of God happened. It's strange that last night I was unable to do the same from #1. Does being able to see one machine on the internal network ha

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-07 Thread Michael Rosen
I now think something else is causing the problem due to the fact that I cannot even connect from machine #2 to #1. I am running Windows XP Home on both. I did check the Windows Firewall last night and it had been reenabled somehow. I disabled it again but still no go. I can't even telnet to th

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Rosen
he listening computer, > you set the appropriate port. Then on the calling computer, you call it > based on the ip:port. Localhost shouldn't be used to call the VNC system > because that means you are connecting to the computer you are calling from. > > ----- Original Message

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Rosen
This is weird. I can't even connect to the first computer from the second. What could cause this computer to be completely cut off yet able to access the Internet? Connecting to PC #1 works from the outside. On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:54:35 -0500, Michael Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Rosen
I tried it and it didn't work. I'm testing on the other computer by connecting to "localhost:6900". On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:38:06 -0500, Michael Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can I do that? I thought multiple connections had to be 5900+X? So, > when I con

Re: Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Rosen
ichael, > > Try changing the ports so that there is a larger separation... In other > words, try 5900 and 6900. > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Michael Rosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:29 AM > Subject: Troubles

Troubleshooting second connection

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Rosen
I currently have a VNC server running on my first computer listening on port 5900. I set up a new computer, installed VNC, configured it to listen on port 5901, duplicated the router port forwarding for the new port and the new IP, and enabled the port in the McAfee firewall. But when I try to co

Re: Eureka

2004-11-06 Thread Michael Rosen
OTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Rosen > Verzonden: vrijdag 5 november 2004 15:13 > Aan: Corni Beerse > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: Eureka ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visi

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-05 Thread Michael Rosen
Right. Although today I'm getting an error, "SelectObject to CompatibleDC failed: The operation completed successfully. (0)." I searched the mailing list archives and see that it's related to XP fast user switching. I thought I had logged off my wife's account this morning but apparently it did

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-05 Thread Michael Rosen
Yes, they are correct. Mike On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:04:13 -, James Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > Have you verified that the ports you are forwarding through your router are > the *same* as the ports VNC is configured to use? > > i.e. Have you got something like > >

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-05 Thread Michael Rosen
Oh, ok, no I did not touch that. It just has a "+" there. On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:21:23 -, James Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > No, I'm referring to the Hosts VNC Server setting, which determines which > hosts can make incoming connections to the server, and is configure

Re: Eureka

2004-11-05 Thread Michael Rosen
Well, as I said, I'm not having any problems with the vnc viewer. It's the java viewer that is causing me problems. I cannot determine what is stopping it from working. Thanks, Mike On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:33:10 +0100, Corni Beerse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Ros

RE: Any Help Would Help - linksys rotuer

2004-11-04 Thread Michael Rosen
Does your ISP assign your IP? I would register a dynamic dns name at www.dyndns.org and get DirectUpdate from www.directupdate.net to ensure your dynamic dns is updated when your IP changes. I've been using both for quite some time now and couldn't live without them. Also, have you forwarded por

Re: Eureka

2004-11-04 Thread Michael Rosen
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:27:21 +0100, Corni Beerse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Rosen wrote: > > > Wow, I finally figured out how to get the client to work at least. > > Since I changed ports I needed to tell the client to connect to > > "myhost:7900."

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-04 Thread Michael Rosen
mon cause of problems is that people delete all the settings from > Hosts, which (for safety) locks out all incoming connections. > > > > Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Rosen
Yes, I'm aware of that and I do have both open in my router and, as far as I can tell, in the firewall. But that doesn't seem to explain why http://localhost:5800 will not work. On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 07:31:40 +0800, Wall, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > James has replied on a few

Eureka

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Rosen
Wow, I finally figured out how to get the client to work at least. Since I changed ports I needed to tell the client to connect to "myhost:7900." Still no such luck on the java side. What's odd is that it appears at first to be connecting as it says web site found, but then it errors out to the

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Rosen
That's part of my problem. I'm unsure exactly how to allow it through Norton's firewall. I thought I had done so, but apparently not. Does the client side look for port 5900 specifically? Thanks, Mike On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:52:05 -, James Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, >

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Rosen
I'm trying to access my home computer from my work computer. I've never had a problem using the client before. I'm only running Norton at home. Sometimes XP fast user switching has been an issue if my wife left her account logged on, but I checked this morning before I left and her account was l

Re: Problems with java viewer

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Rosen
I'm not using XP's firewall as I am already using Norton's. I am unable to even connect to the regular client again today. I'm not sure what's happening. I tried changing ports to 7900/7800 to see if maybe that would help instead of the standard ports. I was unable to connect to 5900 yesterday

Problems with java viewer

2004-11-02 Thread Michael Rosen
I am running Windows XP Home SP2 with Norton Internet Security 2004. I installed the latest version of RealVNC. I have been trying to get the java viewer to work, but when I try to access it I get an error that the server cannot be found. I thought I did everything I needed in my router to enabl