RE: RFB Protocol related question

2005-09-21 Thread James Weatherall
ranslation routines in the operating system. Regards, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: Sood, Sanjeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 September 2005 19:49 > To: James Weatherall; vnc-list@realvnc.com > Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question > >

RE: RFB Protocol related question

2005-09-21 Thread Sood, Sanjeev
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:38 AM To: Sood, Sanjeev; vnc-list@realvnc.com Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question Sanjeev, As I stated in my previous mail, no, your assumption is incorrect. Viewers can request any format they wish, and some do take advantage of

RE: RFB Protocol related question

2005-09-21 Thread James Weatherall
. > -Original Message- > From: Sood, Sanjeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 September 2005 17:55 > To: James Weatherall; vnc-list@realvnc.com > Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question > > Hello James, > > Thanks for your response. So what you are saying is that

RE: RFB Protocol related question

2005-09-21 Thread Sood, Sanjeev
Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:28 AM To: Sood, Sanjeev; vnc-list@realvnc.com Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question Sanjeev, Yes, viewers can request pixel formats that are "larger" than the server's pixel format. i.e. a viewer on a 32

RE: RFB Protocol related question

2005-09-21 Thread James Weatherall
Sanjeev, Yes, viewers can request pixel formats that are "larger" than the server's pixel format. i.e. a viewer on a 32bpp desktop can request 32bpp even though the server is only doing 16bpp. Regards, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAI

Re: RFB Protocol v3.7

2003-09-23 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
Matthias, The desktop resize encoding is described in the RFB 3.7 protocol document. RFB 3.7 is only supported by VNC Server/Viewer 4.0 and above. I think you are confusing what the desktop resize encoding is for. It's sent by the server when the desktop size changes, to the viewer. Not the oth

Re: RFB protocol

2002-06-14 Thread John Roland Elliott
> A silly example I sometimes use here is the next software requirements: > If the input 2 is given, then the result must be 4. If the input 4 is given, > then the result must be 16. > General solution, just writing the requirements: > if input == 2 > then result = 4 > else if input == 4 > th

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-14 Thread Rudi De Vos
sing proper the application. When you need to reboot your unix box, you also make a proper shutdown. Why not just pulling the plug ??? Greetings Rudi -Original Message- From: "Beerse, Corni" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vrijdag 14 juni 2002 10:36 To: '[EMAIL P

Re: RFB protocol

2002-06-14 Thread Jonathan Morton
>M> Are there any plans to update the RFB protocol support things like >M> resoloution and colour depth switching? And other limitiations of >M> the current system? > >M> It's quite annoying when a app changes the desktop resolution, and >M> VNC dumps out. > >TightVNC will support variable screen

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-14 Thread "Beerse, Corné"
tware requirements: If the input 2 is given, then the result must be 4. If the input 4 is given, then the result must be 16. General solution, just writing the requirements: if input == 2 then result = 4 else if input == 4 then result = 16 else ERROR A solution with a little more thinkin

Re: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread Constantin Kaplinsky
Hello, > "M" == MGillespie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: M> Are there any plans to update the RFB protocol support things like M> resoloution and colour depth switching? And other limitiations of M> the current system? M> It's quite annoying when a app changes the desktop resolution, and M>

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread Rudi De Vos
need to be changed and an rfbprotocol need to tell the server that the client support the resizing. Perhaps it is already include in RFB 4.0. Need to check it! <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2002 15:28 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: RFB protocol &g

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread Rudi De Vos
-Original Message- From: "Beerse, Corni" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2002 15:28 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: RFB protocol > -Original Message- > From: Rudi De Vos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The problem is not implemen

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread Andrew van der Stock
TED]] On Behalf Of Rudi De Vos Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2002 9:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RFB protocol The problem is not implementing the option. Just a few changes on server and client site. But changing the client, is loosing compatibility... Rewriting the client for all plat

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread "Beerse, Corné"
> -Original Message- > From: Rudi De Vos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The problem is not implementing the option. > Just a few changes on server and client site. > But changing the client, is loosing compatibility... > Rewriting the client for all platforms. > > The resizing stuff was imp

RE: RFB protocol

2002-06-13 Thread Rudi De Vos
The problem is not implementing the option. Just a few changes on server and client site. But changing the client, is loosing compatibility... Rewriting the client for all platforms. The resizing stuff was implemented in the old Single shared application code. Resizing the application sends an r