On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Wayne Throop wrote:
> I didn't see anybody else mention it, but it's worth noting
> that the use of "plaintext" here is a cryptogaphic technical term,
> meaning "the unencrypted form", as contrasted with "ciphertext".
> The use in "data exchange [] is in plaintext" does not im
: > http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cache/28.html
: But that page says that VNC communicates in "plain text" and I've been
: told repeatedly that it is using some sort of X protocol that is not
: plain text. It's not encrypted, but it isn't plain text either.
I didn't see anybody else mention
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William Hooper wrote:
> >> In fact, the author gives the impression getting the VNC data is
> >> easier than getting plain X11 data.
> >
> > In other words, there is a continuum of difficulty and VNC is harder
> > to get than is plain text (e.g., telnet).
>
> If you have the t
Mike Miller said:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William Hooper wrote:
>
>> Mike Miller said:
>>
>> > But that page says that VNC communicates in "plain text" and I've been
>> > told repeatedly that it is using some sort of X protocol that is not
>> > plain text. It's not encrypted, but it isn't plain tex
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William Hooper wrote:
> Mike Miller said:
>
> > But that page says that VNC communicates in "plain text" and I've been
> > told repeatedly that it is using some sort of X protocol that is not
> > plain text. It's not encrypted, but it isn't plain text either.
> > This is impo
Mike Miller said:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Scott C. Best wrote:
>
>> Heya. Here's some info I've collected over the years regarding
>> securing VNC connections:
>>
>> http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cache/28.html
>
>
> But that page says that VNC communicates in "plain text" and I've been
> t
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 23:59, BloF wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> I built the client, and I'll use any VNC SERVER...
> Any Server encrypts/decrypts the data? Or I'll have to
> change the server myself?
>
The usual method is use a technic called tunneling.
This is the way SSL, SSH, Kabede(sp?) a
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Scott C. Best wrote:
> Heya. Here's some info I've collected over the years regarding
> securing VNC connections:
>
> http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cache/28.html
But that page says that VNC communicates in "plain text" and I've been
told repeatedly that it is usin
Thanks for the link and the explanation.
I understand it now better, and going to read it.
Thanks a lot.
_
BloF:
Heya. Here's some info I've collected over the years
regarding securing VNC connections:
http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cac
BloF:
Heya. Here's some info I've collected over the years
regarding securing VNC connections:
http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cache/28.html
As you'll see in there, the most popular application
used to securify any "plaintext" TCP/IP application (eg, VNC,
X Windows, etc.) is SS
Thanks for your reply.
I built the client, and I'll use any VNC SERVER...
Any Server encrypts/decrypts the data? Or I'll have to
change the server myself?
Dear Blof...
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 22:31, BloF wrote:
> Hello,
> I W
Hello,
I Want to secure the VNC connection.
I read about SSL, digital signature, certificates,
public and private keys, mac.. and more
Now I have 2 questions.
1)Why when I searched for security in VNC results show
mostly SSH, and what is the difference?
2)Is it possible to secure the data transf
Dear Blof...
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 22:31, BloF wrote:
> Hello,
> I Want to secure the VNC connection.
> I read about SSL, digital signature, certificates,
> public and private keys, mac.. and more
>
> Now I have 2 questions.
>
> 1)Why when I searched for security in VNC results show
> mostly SS
BloF said:
> 1)Why when I searched for security in VNC results show
> mostly SSH, and what is the difference?
Most Unix like systems come with SSH already installed.
> 2)Is it possible to secure the data transferred
> between the server and the client without changing the
> server?
I'm not sure
Hello,
I Want to secure the VNC connection.
I read about SSL, digital signature, certificates,
public and private keys, mac.. and more
Now I have 2 questions.
1)Why when I searched for security in VNC results show
mostly SSH, and what is the difference?
2)Is it possible to secure the data transf
gt; Behalf Of Wayne Goldstein
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Secure VNC through firewalls
>
>
> We have a requirement to go through a very secure firewall. Has anyone had
> experience with this matter?
>
> Wayne Goldstein
>
We have a requirement to go through a very secure firewall. Has anyone had
experience with this matter?
Wayne Goldstein
www.globalmentoring.com
Phone: 905-471-9581
Fax: 305-946-7878
Cell: 416-230-8290
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
nt: Thursday, October 17, 2002 6:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Secure VNC over SSL (Works?)
>
>
> Ok Jack, SSH is the key... But can I use the Web browser + SSH
> (transparent)? In fact, my interest is about a solution without
> installations in the client. I read s
much!
-Original-
De: "Budec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de outubro de 2002 19:01
Assunto: RE: Secure VNC over SSL (Works?)
The way I have it setup is like so:
{Big Bad Internet} {Big Bad Internet}{Big Bad Internet}
{
Barnet.
All rights reserverd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Victor Zucarino
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Secure VNC over SSL (Works?)
>
>
Hi all,
To have a secure connection for terminals over Internet, I think about run
vnc over ssl. Reading some posts in the list I dont find the answer to my
question... Ok, my idea:
Run VNC client on the Web browser over a https site.
Is it possible?? I think to use 2 network interfaces in my w
21 matches
Mail list logo
