Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

Hi Ross - I've used Voxbeam forever and they're pretty good, although not glitch-free with the current state of international calling as other folk have already highlighted. Their payment verification is to protect against fraud, which is also rife in the international calling sector. We just

Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

Blimey. International fraud really has got that bad, then!I'd also be interested in a very low-volume personal solution. I'll bet I'm not the only one. The natural solution is for someone running a retail SIP provider on the list who has good international routes to offer accounts to established

Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

Thanks all for the replies. Jay - I'm looking for "no-commit" for a reason :) I use this for my own calls (personal and business) and spend maybe $20 in a busy month (including DIDs). If your retail offering includes a SIP product, though, I'm open to it. A higher per-minute rate (within reason)

Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

Ill Totally agree with Dovid here, It's a huge mess, and a massive PITA, and this kind of thing have the possibility be the demise of the voice industry. (because it will force more traffic to OTT communications) I built and operate a Tier 1 in Australia, and I know that as a result of Scam /

Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

TLDR; Global routing is getting messier and messier. Get a few carriers in route for intl calls. Anything other than a BUSY should fail to the next carrier in route. Global routing has been a cluster as of lately. Two issues have risen as of late. The first is countries cracking down on spam

Re: [VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

On 2023-07-13 14:34, Ross Tajvar via VoiceOps wrote: Looks like voip.ms is one option. Does anyone have any other suggestions? I use voip.ms for my personal tinkering.  I don't have much of a /need/ for them, since I operate an entire telephone company of my own (my

Re: [VoiceOps] Historic Number Data (+1)

I will just say, you can buy a yearly subscription to the LERG instead of monthly, V & H coordinates and switch addresses don't typically change. Which carrier owns a 1K block can be pulled from the pooling website. https://nationalpooling.com/ Then click on reports MARY LOU CAREY BackUP

Re: [VoiceOps] Historic Number Data (+1)

I believe that Iconectiv's TrueNumber Finder product can provide TN history. However, it only goes back to 2018 when Iconectiv took over the NPAC database. https://finder.iconectiv.com/user-cases-finder The V & H coordinates and specific address information can be found in the LERG. You'd

[VoiceOps] No-commit international calling

Hi all, I have an asterisk PBX for personal/business use. I use Flowroute for both origination and termination. Recently I've started needing to make some international calls (specifically mostly to the UK, but also some other places in Europe and Australia). There've been a few numbers where

Re: [VoiceOps] Historic Number Data (+1)

I too am interested in this, but do not want to spend multiple thousands of dollars per month/year to get occasional access to this information. On Thu, 13 Jul 2023, Calvin E. via VoiceOps wrote: What are some recommended sources of number data, as it has changed over time? I only need from

Re: [VoiceOps] Historic Number Data (+1)

I (telcodata) do have an archive of the NANPA data files and the CNAC taken 3 times a week since 2020-10-28. Not sure if they'll work for you. On 7/13/23 15:10, Calvin E. via VoiceOps wrote: What are some recommended sources of number data, as it has changed over time? I only need from 2019

[VoiceOps] Historic Number Data (+1)

What are some recommended sources of number data, as it has changed over time? I only need from 2019 onwards, anything before that is less useful the older it is. Firstly the actual number data: Activate/Deactivate/Reactivate/Reassign NPA, NPA-NXX, Thousand Block, TN Mobile/Landline I presume

Re: [VoiceOps] STIR/SHAKEN warning!

On 2023-07-12 16:37, Nathan Anderson via VoiceOps wrote: By the way, love your test tool service.  Thanks for putting it together and maintaining it...what a gift to the community. There are a handful of S/S testing tools out there, but yours is easily the most comprehensive...most just

Re: [VoiceOps] Update on STIR/SHAKEN

Good morning everyone.  I see my company got brought up here, and we are probably a good use case in the entire ecosystem to consider when it comes to Robocall mitigation.  What is my companies (or any other white-label resellers) responsibilities to it.While we do not have a direct end-user