and not in ascertaining one’s ability to send the
attestation more or less directly to the receiver.
> On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:40 PM, Joseph Jackson wrote:
>
> I have a test number that will read back the attestation details but the
> problem is if you don’t send it through our network
I have a test number that will read back the attestation details but the
problem is if you don't send it through our network as a peer/customer and it
comes over say flowroute they strip off the headers and don't send them.I'm
working on changing that by updating the LRN on the number but it
Is now. If you look at their BGP announcements over the last week using
something like bgplay you can see them move all their prefixes behind
cloudflare.
From: Mike Hammett [mailto:voice...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2021 10:30 AM
To: Joseph Jackson
Cc: Tim Bray; voiceops
Bandwidth.com is using cloudflares magic transit for DDOS protection. Seems to
be working ok. CF says it doesn’t matter the protocol they can scrub the
traffic.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray via
VoiceOps
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2021 9:34 AM
To
re signed.
But then the verification would fail, and the call should not be delivered.
That's part of the beauty of the system.
Best regards,
John
On 7/1/2021 12:29, Joseph Jackson wrote:
I've heard that TNSi also counts on the date header being present.
So far we don't se
I've heard that TNSi also counts on the date header being present.
So far we don't see a lot of people passing tokens with the date header.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
Yaklin
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2021 12:25 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject
compared to the RURI in a way that has bearing on routing, nor anything
else functional.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Jul 1, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Joseph Jackson wrote:
We’ve seen this on Ribbon SBCs running their 8.2.x code. If a forwarded call
comes in
We’ve seen this on Ribbon SBCs running their 8.2.x code. If a forwarded call
comes in (where the number on the RURI is not the same as the To) when the PSX
does an LNP dip it will rewrite the RURI to the LRN. Which of course causes
the call to fail.
I have no idea if this is the same issue b
Is that a bad thing?
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 10:07 AM
To: Adam Moffett; VoiceOps
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] USF is 33.4% for 2Q2021
It feels like every year, I see some elementary school
Hi Matt,
>From rfc5806
The Redirection Counter value minus 1 SHOULD be stored in the
diversion- counter associated with the top-most Diversion header.
Presence of the diversion-counter for the bottom-most Diversion
header is optional. If present, the diversion-counter of the bottom-
Hey list,
Question for anyone that uses ATT AVOICS product. For calls with invalid
numbers are you seeing a 404 back or are they playing an announcement? If they
are playing an announcement is it always played?
Thanks!
Joseph
___
VoiceOps mailing
If it’s a VOIP call you can grab stats from it using a number of different
products.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of
mgra...@mstvp.com
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 3:38 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Call Quality Scoring?
This may be a silly q
I see the registration failures to their sip.flowroute.com sbc.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of chris
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:42 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] flowroute down?
flowroute appears to be down hard from here on the east coast
I don’t know many places that encrypt their voice traffic.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Dan York
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:45 PM
To: Kidd Filby
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SS7
This is generally true if the calls are *unencrypted
: [VoiceOps] Load balancing SIP
On 04/19/2016 07:07 PM, Joseph Jackson wrote:
> Used the dispatch module if I remember correctly. I will try and find
> them as its been awhile.
Yep, dispatcher would be the canonical approach:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/dispatcher.html
H
I will try and find them as its been awhile.
Joseph
From: Sykes, Aaron [mailto:aaron.sy...@cdk.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:00 PM
To: Joseph Jackson; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: RE: Load balancing SIP
Did you use these devices for this purpose on separate occasions or in unison?
Ive done it with Brocade and Kamailio.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Sykes, Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 4:32 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Load balancing SIP
Has anyone had any success load balancing SIP? More specifically distrib
We only give 503's for destinations not in route. If the term provider gives
us a 404 we pass that along.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 12:47 PM
To: James Milko
Cc: VoiceOps
Subject: R
http://sipcapture.org/ works great. Good team. They have a commercial product
as well.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Nelson Hicks
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:47 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] SIP packet capture with index
I'm looking
Depends on the destination.Apparently some customers of ours report any
PDD over 5 secs. We work any and all tickets we get submitted.
Joseph
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:32 PM
NANOG. I hate RFC 2919 non-compliant mailers ]
- Original Message -
> From: "Joseph Jackson"
> Check out Homer @ http://sipcapture.org we love it. There is also a
> commercial version that has more features / support.
Well, I don't know if Homer hsa the realtime
Check out Homer @ http://sipcapture.org we love it. There is also a commercial
version that has more features / support.
Enjoy.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:01 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops
22 matches
Mail list logo
