Why do we assume the caller has the right to place calls from the number
he’s using?
If you can call him back and reach him at the number from which he is
calling, then I would have a stronger reason to believe that he actually
has the right place calls from that number.
But in the absence of
My understanding is that this is all about the administrative friction of
transfers and re-registrations.
Once you’re registered with the FCC, state Public Utilities Commissions,
local authorities for access to right of way and pole access, name changes
and transfers can be complex. Then there
, the health-and-safety element of voice telecom is a big part of the
reason it’s important. People depend on us — in a small way — for their
safety.
—
Mark R Lindsey ECG +1-229-316-0013
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 21:45 Jay Hennigan wrote:
> This should be fun. FCC is designating 9-8-8 as a serv
Almost certainly, answering these misdials and listening is part of a
robocalling detection platform. It’s a PSTN honeypot.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:02 Mary Lou Carey
wrote:
> Interesting marketing tactic! Makes them appear helpful and accrues CABS
> revenue.
>
> MARY LOU CAREY
> BackUP
Are both SHERBROOKE ‘s in the same LATA number? BroadWorks distinguishes
the same names based on LATA. E.g., there are tons of “Springfield”s and
“Albany”s in the US and Canada but in different LATAs.
If you’re using BroadWorks LCA, then you’ll also need to load an
NNACL-formatted file. (I think
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com
wrote:
On 06/09/2014 02:50 PM, Mark R Lindsey wrote:
2. Increase the ptime from 20 ms to 30-40 ms to reduce packet-drop
exposure
Or does this thesis lean on countervailing tendencies, such as overall
reduced PPS in a
