run into specifically with
Hotels. Seems different than a typical office setup. Thinking about
the need to re-bill usage on a daily basis, per room 911 concerns, Daily
Voicemail setup/cleans. What else would make a setup like this special?
Nate Burke
Blast Communications
Not sure about the people, but I live in Naperville, and Comcast has
left that building (all their signage is down)
On 6/16/2022 5:21 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
At Comcast, when you file an FCC complaint, it goes to these people
(as of a couple years ago, might be different people now):
William L
For reasons exactly like this, we will only deploy an Adtran (TA-90x is
what I use) in front of a Mitel system, for either POTS or PRI Handoff.
Everything else has just been nothing but problems inter-oping to the
MITEL.Normally we just walk away from a MITEL System anymore. The
support h
.
There is nothing that I can do for my customer to assist with this,
since I'm not involved anywhere in the call path, correct? The payroll
company would have to open a fraud report with their carrier for any
investigation?
Nate Burke
Blast Communica
Sorry if this was already discussed and I missed it. I saw a notice on
our Voip Innovations account today that any business DID's that send SMS
messages to a consumer in any way now have to be registered with
'Campaignregistry.com' Looks like this requires a $200 signup, and then
potentially
I don't work with SS7, so this may just be a coincidence, but 2 days ago
I was having VoIP Troubles that appeared to be with traffic Traversing a
Telia circuit between my endpoint and my provider. Did not affect all
traffic, not even entire /24's. It was like Telia was dropping some UDP
traff
s transmission and to
immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended/
/to waive any applicable privileges./
----
*From:* Nate Burke
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 19, 2019 11:41:01 AM
*To:* Matthew Yaklin; voiceops@voi
ble privileges./
*From:* VoiceOps on behalf of Nate
Burke
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 19, 2019 10:44:50 AM
*To:* voiceops@voiceops.org
*Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] ATA To Connect to Mitel PBX
Thanks to everyone for the replies. The MITEL Tech is being 0 help
other than
7/2019 9:07 PM, Todd Wolf wrote:
This link is relevant to your issue
https://supportforums.adtran.com/thread/2264
On Jun 17, 2019, at 9:36 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
Sorry for Dredging up an old post. I've had the Adtran TA908 (2nd gen)
installed to the MITEL for about a month, but now I
like the TA and the phone system are not in
agreement about what method of disconnect supervision (if any) the TA is going
to provide and the phone system trunks are going to be looking for.
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of
I've only had to provide POTS termination to 1 MITEL system. I tried
using Linksys/Cisco SPA and Grandstream ATA's, then finally put in an
Adtran TA904 (2nd gen). The Adtran seemed to give the least number of
issues with Lines getting stuck open, Echo, etc. But the (former)
customer was still
We're getting ready to provide VoIP Lines to a hotel (to go into an
existing PBX) They have a Mitel system as well. The Feed lines to the
Mitel are just POTS lines (started as straight POTS, now POTS out of a
FlexT1), so I can't imagine there is anything special about 911 other
than providing
:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: 'Nate Burke' , voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability
...aand we're back.
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, March 1
ented it too - I haven't checked to see if any traffic was
sent across it
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Nate Burke <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote:
Only 15 Minutes this time though. I had implemented the Disaster
Recover Trunk as mentioned previously, but
Only 15 Minutes this time though. I had implemented the Disaster
Recover Trunk as mentioned previously, but I didn't seem to be getting
any calls completed through it.
On 3/17/2016 4:16 PM, Shripal Daphtary wrote:
Down again!
Thanks,
Shripal
On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Nate
definitely did not come in from the DR.
-- Nathan
*From:*VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of
*Nate Burke
*Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:27 PM
*To:* voiceops@voiceops.org
*Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability
Annnd they're down again.
On 3/
7;t reach their SBC or did not reach it in a timely manner).
-- Nathan
*From:*VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of
*Jeff Waddell
*Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:53 PM
*To:* Nate Burke
*Cc:* voiceops@voiceops.org
*Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] VoIP Innovations reliability
Th
Annnd they're down again.
On 3/17/2016 5:14 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
6 calls from 4 different CID numbers. All within 3 minutes.
On 3/17/2016 4:58 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
Yesterday I definitely saw calls coming from the DR IP in my logs,
but I had not yet added that IP as a peerin ou
Looks like it just came back up for me. Just over 30 min.
Nate
On 3/16/2016 8:45 AM, Shripal Daphtary wrote:
We are experiencing an outage as well.
Thanks,
Shripal
On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Nate Burke <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote:
Problems again this morning? Looks to
Anyone else show them down again right now? My traceroutes aren't even
leaving Chicago. Dying at a Chicago hop on Level3.
Nate
On 3/6/2016 6:50 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
Did anybody else just suffer another 45-minute-ish long outage from about 4:00p
PST to 4:45p PST (ending about 5 minutes
20 matches
Mail list logo
