Mike Johnston wrote:
> On 2023-07-26 17:43, Paul Timmins via VoiceOps wrote:
> > I wouldn't be surprised to see carriers dumping these calls via a GSM
> > gateway, this is really common in europe with gray routes. It'd
> > explain why you get weird cellular voicemail, if they sent the number
>
On 2023-07-26 17:43, Paul Timmins via VoiceOps wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised to see carriers dumping these calls via a GSM gateway,
this is really common in europe with gray routes. It'd explain why you get
weird cellular voicemail, if they sent the number to the cell phone wrong to
actually
or such a break-down
> occurring?
>
> -- Nathan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Frankel [mailto:dfran...@zipdx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 8:01 AM
> To: 'Mark R Lindsey'; Nathan Anderson
> Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
> Subject: RE: [Vo
Mike Johnston wrote:
> I serve a rural area. I do the technical "make it work" stuff. I'm
> generally only involved in the business dealings insofar as determining
> technical incompatibilities (draw 7 red lines, all perpendicular, some
> with green ink and some with transparent). That said,
urring?
>
> -- Nathan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Frankel [mailto:dfran...@zipdx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 8:01 AM
> To: 'Mark R Lindsey'; Nathan Anderson
> Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
> Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] Call term misr
x27;Mark R Lindsey'; Nathan Anderson
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] Call term misrouting?
Mark's reference to the RCC regs is pointing in the right direction.
The problem stems from sketchy providers trying to save money routing via
circuitous pathways, which often end up wit
I serve a rural area. I do the technical "make it work" stuff. I'm
generally only involved in the business dealings insofar as determining
technical incompatibilities (draw 7 red lines, all perpendicular, some
with green ink and some with transparent). That said, please forgive
any errors in
:32 AM
To: Nathan Anderson
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call term misrouting?
It would not only be a form of fraud, but sounds be a violation of the Rural
Call Completion rules (specifically 47 CFR 64.2119(a)). I would recommend
you make a complaint to the FCC and categorize
It would not only be a form of fraud, but sounds be a violation of the Rural
Call Completion rules (specifically 47 CFR 64.2119(a)). I would recommend you
make a complaint to the FCC and categorize them at Rural Call Completion
issues. Provide as much info as you can on carrier names, dates and
Hi Nathan -
I don't think that your supposition that the calls are being misrouted for
the carrier doing it to collect the termination revenue's far from the
truth. This has been going on forever in myriad ways - send answer on
ringing (extends the chargeable duration of a call), route calls to f
...by which I mean, we send a call to a term provider via SIP, who then *seems*
to terminate the call to the wrong callee entirely.
What the heck actually causes this?
Whenever I have experienced it, it inevitably involves a rural carrier of some
kind, one that likely charges a lot to accept tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
