Hi Michael,
You may be pleased to know that I find your
"little rant on computational chemistry and
the excessive application of quantum theory
and computers in chemistry"
very interesting indeed. 8-)
Frank Grimer
At 07:35 pm 22-07-04 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Hello Keith,
>
>I rather doubt
Spurred on by your reply, Keith, I thought I would actually read
the first article myself. I found it extremely valuable in that
it demonstrates the bankruptcy of a reductionist approach to
physics. People who believe they can understand the world by
reducing it to its ultimate parts are cracke
The Barron's nerve idea is interesting.
The thing is if we could read ,measure ,or hear the pulse's,
we would still need and interputer device.GES
Hello Keith,
I rather doubt that anyone on this list will have any interest in my little rant on
computational chemistry and the excessive application of quantum theory and computers
in chemistry, but you asked for it.
This is a trend in the sciences in general, but I find it particularly anno
According to Konstantine Meyl on page 201 (Scalar Waves), nerve fibers in the human brain operate just like one wire diamagnetic cold electrical systems. The nerve fibers electrical potentials are 70 to 90 mV, and receive and process diamagnetic cold electrical signals. If we were to construct a
Hi Jeffery,
I have another follow-up question regarding the fascinating Brady device,
which I hope you or other vortexians can answer.
It is your suspicion that the Brady device is spinning due to the result of
stored kinetic energy from the stators induced into the rotors as the
stators were act
Edmund Storms writes:
> Mass and energy are only equivalent when energy is converted to
mass. When energy
> exists only as energy, it does not have the property of mass.
That would be potential energy, I suppose, and my understanding is that it
does have mass. When you wind a watch, raise a roc
===
A Jed Rothwell quote from the Pure Energy Systems thread [21-7-04]
"People believe in things so firmly they come to imagine they can actually
observe -- or physically feel -- abstractions and generalizations. Someone
wh
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Edmund Storms writes:
>
> > > Eventually they were talking about boiling away the oceans of earth ten
> > > time over with the ZPE in a few [square] centimeters of space. That sounds
> > > ridiculous to me.
> >
> > Of course it is ridiculous. This is like saying at all
Hi Michael.
You should elaborate. I skimmed the first article, and although it
seemed a bit obtuse, it did attempt to address a serious question;
just how good is the current quantum theory at explaining the nature
of the periodic table. Every time I have ventured down that road,
I've felt like an
And just think, hard working tax payers are paying this guy's salary.
M.
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Fred (I thought that you went through another "sign-off" cycle yesterday - that one
was pretty quick, maybe you were waiting for this),
Just to prove your point that humans are basically brain-damaged monkeys, consider the
following logic (or strange trail of near-sequiters... or 'non'... depen
According to Horowitz, humans are brain-damaged monkeys.
""I've never seen or heard of this before," said Horowitz. One possible explanation
is brain damage from the illness, he said."
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/22/monkey.walking.ap/index.html
Walking monkey apes humans
Thursday, Ju
Edmund Storms writes:
> > Eventually they were talking about boiling away the oceans of earth ten
> > time over with the ZPE in a few [square] centimeters of space. That sounds
> > ridiculous to me.
>
> Of course it is ridiculous. This is like saying at all the energy in the
oceans,
> if extracted
The original (restored) Santa Fe #3751 was through Belen, NM in August 1992 on a run
to
Chicago & back. When I heard the whistle (distinct from the 100+ per day diesel
freights
passing the crossing about 1/3 mile from the house) I about freaked out. :-)
http://photographytips.com/page.cfm/2219
Jed Rothwell posted
Jeff Kooistra wrote:
Reactionless drives (and anti-gravity machines, which are more or
less the same thing) are also impossible, because they violate
Newton's third law. That does not
I've always wanted to build an improved version of the Cook Drive,
www.forceborne.com , to
16 matches
Mail list logo
