At 2:44 PM 10/21/4, Horace Heffner (I) wrote:
>Perhaps line loss problems go away if a well tuned transmission line is
>used, especially a coaxial line or micrwave waveguide? It certainly is
>true that transmission loss in modern glass is fairly low, perhaps AC or
>microwave transmission by waveg
More food for thought. Efficient underground long line bulk electric
energy transmission, like that from nuclear plants, might be achieved using
very low frequencies, like 1 Hz or less. Unlike pure DC, this approach
would facilitate using low frequency motor-generator sets at the delivery
end to
Hi,
These are indeed our Ultraconductors. David has been a consultant to the
Company in the past. He studied these polymers on a U.S. government grant
for a year before we met him back about 1995. He has published several
papers about these polymers before and since and has a somewhat differe
Something that I would personally like to see is all electrical
transmission and distribution under ground. Here in Alaska there are
various nice neighborhoods that have underground power, but there are many
neighborhoods and great vistas along the roadsides spoiled by unsightly
power lines. One
In a message dated 10/20/04 7:24:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heffner mentioned randomness. In automatic flow control a setpoint is maintained by selecting a proportional band and determining the number of resets per minute that would permit the control to average the fl
--- Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is all true historically, but in hindsight we
> can ask -
> were there any missed opportunities along the way?
> When it
> comes to moving lots of power hundreds of miles
> through
> Transmission Lines, and given that historically
> "other"
> con
Jones Beene wrote:
BTW, do I detect that you are professionally involved in
power transmission and distribution design now ?
No, that was another life, 17 years ago.
Hi.
I was wondering if Mark Goldes had a comment about this
paper that just came over my (virtual) desk.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0410503
It sounded sort of familiar.
K.
Terry,
> You haven't done much transmission and distribution design
I gather. :-)
Nope... but this was meant to be mildly thought-provoking
with a touch of geek humor, rather than time to see if the
bootleged CAD program will load...
> Either bus gives you 120 VAC rms to ground (neutral) and
>
One further even more highly speculative thought...
free-form thinking permitted.
Lets say that between your house and the power station there
are six transformers, three up and three down, and 16% total
line loss; and each transformer is 98% efficient. Note that
these losses are all COMPOUNDED ju
Jones Beene wrote:
Way too much.
You haven't done much transmission and distribution design I gather. :-)
AC has one great advantage when clearing fault currents: it goes
through zero current 120 times a second. DC faults tend to burn until
you melt away enough bus structure that the air gap r
At 2:00 PM 10/21/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 10/21/2004 12:07:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> The subject, though, was 100 GHz rectification and power supply size. My
>> point was that FETs overcame the drop in efficiency of diodes at high
>> freque
In a message dated 10/21/2004 12:07:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The subject, though, was 100 GHz rectification and power supply size. My
point was that FETs overcame the drop in efficiency of diodes at high
frequencies, but FETs too have their limitations and drop off i
In a message dated 10/21/2004 12:31:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is the main point which I meant to make before.
Although the low loss technology for HV DC was not in place
during the Westinghouse-Edison-Tesla days, one wonders if
some kind of imposed national R&D ef
Looks like I managed to inadvertently offend quite a few EEs
with previous posting. My apologies... as that was not the
intention. The main culprits in the "big picture" of the
national electric "grid" then as now, is/was lack of
adequate long-term planning, the jealous guarding of
antiquated comme
At 8:56 PM 10/20/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 10/20/2004 8:44:32 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> One main problem with using high
>> frequency transformers in power supplies until fairly recently was
>> rectification. Diodes drop in efficiency with freq
At 07:04 am 21-10-04 -0500, you wrote:
>BlankWe are not seeking OU in our studies of mechanical vortexes. The task we face is
>to meet an ever growing demand for better mixing of chemicals into liquids. The
>nightmare scenario of problems presented the water treating industry by the entrance
>o
See:
http://www.iccf11.org/images/All%20abstracts.pdf
http://www.iccf11.org/index2.htm
Message from Biberian:
Dear colleague,
The ICCF11 web site has been updated, it includes now the full program, and
all the abstracts.
We also have added a press section.
Please contact me if you see any error s
Horace wrote:
> One of the reasons 60 Hz was chosen over higher frequencies is the
> prevention of transmission line losses. One main problem with using high
> freqency transformers in power supplies until fairly recently was
> rectification. Diodes drop in efficiency with frequency. These day
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: All Over Reactance
The short answer to Jone's comments about shrinking power supplies and why
did it take so long, etc. is that transformers are needed to isolate the
circuits from the ma
We are not seeking OU in our studies of mechanical vortexes. The task we
face is to meet an ever growing demand for better mixing of chemicals
into liquids.The nightmare scenario of problems presented the water treating
industry by the entrance of exotic toxic chemicals, drugs , viruses and
Beta Minus decay is always accompanied by an Antineutrino.
The reaction of an Antineutrino (*v) from Beta Minus decay in the atmosphere,
hydrosphere, or in the earth with any Free or Nuclear Proton:
Antineutrino + Proton -> Neutron + (e+)
Note that a Neutron + Proton > Deuterium
At 03:31 pm 20-10-04 -0400, you wrote:
>Frank writes:
>>Both Ing.Saviour and I have quite independently recognised that
>>mass has the dimension of T/L (see http://www.blazelabs.com/)
>>and it is evident that materons have "hidden mass".
>
>Add me to the list too. In '91 I was studying the
>CGS s
23 matches
Mail list logo
