Horace Heffner posted;
Given that all else fails to stop global warming, and action is taken soon
enough that a 10 percent reduction in the solar insolation factor over the
I've heard some grand schemes Horace, and this is one of the grandest.
Assuming the deployment of this amount of payload can g
Seems that if a compound in the earth's statosphere
needed to be removed, the safest method may be by incineration using parapolic
shaped mirror reflectors. The reflectors would be adjustable to focus at a
specific range.
Richard
<>
> [Original Message]
> From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Akira Kawasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2/4/2005 12:16:03 PM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, February 04, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 04 Feb 05 Washington, DC
1. STATE OF THE UNION: OUR ANNUAL LOOK AT WHERE SC
Robin wrote:
> And the real cause of the problem is the greed of those who maintain a
monopoly over energy supply, when unlimited sources of clean energy are
available in black projects. IOW they continue to flog oil, even though
clean alternatives are available, simply because there is no profit
At 9:47 AM 2/6/5, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>In fact there is an SF movie that covers a very similar scenario (one of
>the Highlander movies?).
No kidding! What did they put in orbit and how did they get it there?
Regards,
Horace Heffner
>>>Just increase the stack height of the Chenney-Bush Coal-Burning (Hydrogen
Generating)
power plants, and remove the scrubbers so that the "Fly Ash" vents into the
stratosphere.
Such ash was originally thought to be the cause of global-cooling, in the
1970s.
Craig (Houston)
A Simple Solution:
Just increase the stack height of the Chenney-Bush Coal-Burning (Hydrogen Generating)
power plants, and remove the scrubbers so that the "Fly Ash" vents into the stratosphere.
Frederick
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:28:33 -0900:
Hi Horace,
[snip]
>At 9:00 AM 2/6/5, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>>In reply to Michael Foster's message of Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:19:57 -0500:
>>Hi,
>>>
>>>This is an example of how a bunch of really quite intelligent people,
>>
At 9:00 AM 2/6/5, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>In reply to Michael Foster's message of Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:19:57 -0500:
>Hi,
>>
>>This is an example of how a bunch of really quite intelligent people,
>>i.e., the people on this list, can launch off into something with
>>potentially disastrous result
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:19:57 -0500:
Hi,
>
>This is an example of how a bunch of really quite intelligent people,
>i.e., the people on this list, can launch off into something with
>potentially disastrous results. What if the people on this list had
Agreed.
[s
This is an example of how a bunch of really quite intelligent people,
i.e., the people on this list, can launch off into something with
potentially disastrous results. What if the people on this list had
actual political power? What if they could implement this project on
a global scale, all wit
Glad to see some good ideas flowing on vortex on this thread.
A good means of dispersal might be the use of a laser or plasma torch to
disperse in atomic form. This atomic form might achieve a much better
initial coverage than nanoparticles, but would probably eventually
aggregate into nanopartic
Harry,
That is James Lovelocks gender assignation; I have a hard
time thinking of a planet as having a penis or a vagina.
OTOH, I've never seen a man give birth to something, so
it's maybe more analogous to a woman than a man.
Many fathers are absent, and the earth remains beneath our feet.
Henc
--- RC Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BlankWhy so you say? Because everything in nature
> has its stinger out !!
>
> Richard
Not to mention that this year (starts Feb 12) is the
Chinese year of the Cock...
If the payload is not sensitive to G-forces why not just rail gun pellets up
to the necessary altitude and disperse with a shaped charge? Low cost,
known technology. Space fireworks...
Such a system could allow non-permanent low orbit clouds of which the
density could be cost effectively repleni
Not that inhaling it is all that good of an idea, but you get more aluminum
oxide exposure from your underarm anti-perspirant... yeah, just try and find
one that doesn't have it. Nice catch 22 eh? What's the point in being
mentally 100% if you are too stinky to be around... ha ha
-john
-Ori
Why so you say? Because everything in nature has its
stinger out !!
Richard
<>
Keith Nagel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Getting the powder into position won't be cheap with rockets.
> If we have the luxury of some time, loading the tops of the
> big volcanos with powder might be a cheap way to blast great
> wads of the stuff into space, assuming we get lucky and the
> ole g
Hey Horace,
Given that powdered metals in general make good catalysts for
chemical reactions, I'm not sure they are appropriate for
this application. Wouldn't something inert and light ( Boron perhaps )
be better? OTOH, if you could tailor the catalyzed reactions
to clean and repair the upper atmo
I wrote (before following "leads" from Terry's
reference)
> Another possiblility, assuming that space robotics
is
> perfected for use with Hubble etc.
Had I looked further on this authoritative site I
would have found
http://www.flatwoodsmonster.com/
and realized that the "authorities" have
--- Horace Heffner wrote:
> Given that all else fails to stop global warming,
and action is taken soon enough that a 10 percent
reduction in the solar insolation factor [snip] The
total deployed mass is thus 166,000 metric tons. The
price is about 1.7 trillion dollars.
INTERESTING... and a barga
At 6:57 AM 2/5/5, Terry Blanton wrote:
>--- Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The objective might be met by dispersing orbiting
>> aluminum nanopowder
>
>Some believe this is already underway though at lower
>altitudes:
>
>http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=1108
This is horrific
--- Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The objective might be met by dispersing orbiting
> aluminum nanopowder
Some believe this is already underway though at lower
altitudes:
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=1108
__
Do You Yahoo
In line with the possibility of CF-type reactions with 250 kilovolt at 100 microamp
deuteron beams (25 watts) referred to in the lenr-canr files:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KimYEpossibleeva.pdf
Electron Beam Welding (EBW) machines can produce 30 Kilowatts or more
with 150 kilovolt electron
Given that all else fails to stop global warming, and action is taken soon
enough that a 10 percent reduction in the solar insolation factor over the
EM band around 10^-6 m, from latitudes 50 to -50, can stop or reverse the
warming, then the following is suggested as a rough first estimate of how
t
Given that all else fails to stop global warming, and action is taken soon
enough that a 10 percent reduction in the solar insolation factor over the
EM band around 10^-6 m, from latitudes 50 to -50, then the following is
suggested as a rough first estimate of how this might be done.
The objectiv
26 matches
Mail list logo
