Robin van Spaandonk wrote:-
Note that the people at
http://www.dolphinaci.com/technology/technology.html are already
getting 90+ mpg in some tests, and outperforming the Prius in all
tests, and all they have done is somewhat modify a conventional
engine
Be careful about believing these results
--- Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful about believing these results from one of
the Joseph LaStella stable of companies...
I absolutely agree !! This is DISinformation, pure and
simple, and poorly done to boot. AND it is not even
Detroit, by 1500 miles.
Without any doubt this
no, the support the troop ribbons are all magnetic. next time you see
one, peel it off to see. (or, do like i do. i printed up several
8x10 sheets of bumpersticker paper with small sections that say bring
them home now. i simply put that on their car right underneath
support our troops. )
On
Keith Nagel and Horace Heffner responded;
J. Swift writes:
Our histories of six thousand moons make no mention of any other
My first reaction was to say that I fail to see the connection
between this part of Gulliver's Travels and the the question at hand.
On further reflection You have the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
So far. There is no telling when
a skeptic will come and erase it. There is no control and no recourse.
Say what? Is this the same Wikipedia I'm familiar
with?
There is control and there is recourse. A page which someone
deletes for personal reasons can be retrieved.
At 11:14 AM 3/24/5, thomas malloy wrote:
The idea that Yehovah, and Allah are the same entity is pure
nonsense. Ditto for the idea that Shariah is a substitute for Torah.
I thought I'd made the case adequately, but apparently I didn't.
You completely failed to address the issue and you seem to
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 11:14 AM 3/24/5, thomas malloy wrote:
The idea that Yehovah, and Allah are the same entity is pure
nonsense. Ditto for the idea that Shariah is a substitute for Torah.
I thought I'd made the case adequately, but apparently I didn't.
You completely failed to
There is a general solution. If G-d is Omnipresent, there is but One by exclusion; and,all monotheistic religions are worshiping the same G-d by definition.
"I am that I am"Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jews and Christians worship the god of Abraham. Islamists worship the godof Abraham.
From: thomas malloy
...
My first reaction was to say that I fail to see
the connection between this part of Gulliver's Travels
and the the question at hand. On further reflection
You have the misguided idea that the difference
between Judeo Christianity and Islam is the same
difference
I think you might find this of interest:
"There are certain striking similarities between the Hindu god Brahma and his consort Saraisvati, and the Jewish Abraham and Sarai, that are more than mere coincidences."
http://www.hermetics.org/Abraham2.html"Stephen A. Lawrence" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
There is a general solution. If G-d is Omnipresent, there is but One
by exclusion; and, all monotheistic religions are worshiping the same
G-d by definition.
I am that I am
Um ... You are assuming all those who _think_ they are worshiping the
One God are indeed doing
Nope, I make no assumptions about the worshiper. The condition is that G-d is Omnipresent. This is an interesting philosophy in that before there was a Creation, there was only the Creator. The only material to compose the Creation must come from the Creator; therefore, all that is, is G-d
Terry Blanton wrote:
Nope, I make no assumptions about the worshiper. The condition is
that G-d is Omnipresent. This is an interesting philosophy in that
before there was a Creation, there was only the Creator. The only
material to compose the Creation must come from the Creator;
Terry Blanton wrote:
I think you might find this of interest:
There are certain striking similarities between the Hindu god
*Brahma* and his consort *Saraisvati,* and the Jewish *Abraham* and
*Sarai*, that are more than mere coincidences.
http://www.hermetics.org/Abraham2.html
Thanks --
See:
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/shostak_daring_050324.html
Quote:
. . . So a researcher has to make a choice of whether to interpret the
data and gamble on discovery, or keep quiet, continue the slog, and risk
being trumped by a competitor. In other words, there's a fine balance
between
A lot of garbage, mixed in with some truth:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,9865,1444306,00.html
- Jed
LOL! You shouldn't read my posts. Sometimes my NLP goes haywire. :-)
Have you ever heard of the Cathars?
It's my own gnostic variation. Well, actually, I got it from a Playboy article about 30 years ago. It goes something like this. G-d got bored so he created Man for his entertainment. Man does
I think you can reach the author at;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsEb=179047
Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you contact these idots?!? I do not see a contact page or editor. Let's everyone write to them, and set them
Terry Blanton wrote:
I think you can reach the author
at;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm . . . Let's have some of the big guns write him. Or
everyone?!?
- Jed
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
First, how can something which
is all good spawn something evil? How can pure evil come from pure
good? Clearly it can't -- if the good gives birth to the evil then
the good must have incorporated the evil to start with and the good must
not have been pure good, after
Oops! That should read 'Nora Baron'.
"Onegod dogone it!"
- Me, after an insane day on the nutfarm.Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should ask Nora Barton eg. site!
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
From: Terry Blanton
...
I further conjecture that to be the Creation, it must
be not G-d; therefore, all that lives is separate from
G-d. If G-d is all that is Good; then, all that is
must be Evil and the end of Creation is the return to
G-d. Is this why 'live' is 'evil' spelled
done - thanks for the address
At 02:52 PM 3/24/2005 -0800, you wrote:
I think you can reach the author
at;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsEb=179047
Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you contact these idots?!? I do not see a contact page or editor.
If the project succeeds, the DOE predicts that by
2011, Stirling solar-dish farms could be delivering
electricity to the grid at costs comparable to
traditional electricity sources, thereby reducing the
U.S. need for foreign sources of fossil fuels.
24 matches
Mail list logo
